Deriving depth‐dependent light escape efficiency and optical Swank factor from measured pulse height spectra of scintillators

Abstract

Purpose Pulse height spectroscopy has been used by investigators to deduce the imaging properties of scintillators. Pulse height spectra (PHS) are used to compute the Swank factor, which describes the variation in scintillator light output per x-ray interaction. The spread in PHS measured below the K-edge is related to the optical component of the Swank factor, i.e. variations in light escape efficiency from different depths of x-ray interaction in the scintillator, denoted ε̄(z). Optimizing scintillators for medical imaging applications requires understanding of these optical properties, as they determine tradeoffs between parameters such as x-ray absorption, light yield, and spatial resolution. This work develops a model for PHS acquisition such that the effect of measurement uncertainty can be removed. This method allows ε̄(z) to be quantified on an absolute scale and permits more accurate estimation of the optical Swank factor of scintillators. Methods The pulse height spectroscopy acquisition chain was modeled as a linear system of stochastic gain stages. Analytical expressions were derived for signal and noise propagation through the PHS chain, accounting for deterministic and stochastic aspects of x-ray absorption, scintillation, and light detection with a photomultiplier tube. The derived expressions were used to calculate PHS of thallium-doped cesium iodide (CsI) scintillators using parameters that were measured, calculated, or known from literature. PHS were measured at 25 and 32 keV of CsI samples designed with an optically-reflective or absorptive backing, with or without a fiber-optic faceplate (FOP), and with thicknesses ranging from 150–1000 μm. Measured PHS were compared with calculated PHS, then light escape model parameters were varied until measured and modeled results reached agreement. Resulting estimates of ε̄(z) were used to calculate each scintillator’s optical Swank factor. Results For scintillators of the same optical design, only minor differences in light escape efficiency were observed between samples with different thickness. As thickness increased, escape efficiency decreased by up to 20% for interactions furthest away from light collection. Optical design (i.e. backing and FOP) predominantly affected the magnitude and relative variation in ε̄(z). Depending on interaction depth and scintillator thickness, samples with an absorptive backing and FOP were estimated to yield 4.1–13.4 photons/keV. Samples with a reflective backing and FOP yielded 10.4–18.4 keV−1, while those with a reflective backing and no FOP yielded 29.5–52.0 keV−1. Optical Swank factors were approximately 0.9 and near-unity in samples featuring an absorptive or reflective backing, respectively. Conclusions This work uses a modeling approach to remove the noise introduced by the measurement apparatus from measured PHS. This method allows absolute quantification of ε̄(z) and more accurate estimation of the optical Swank factor of scintillators. The method was applied to CsI scintillators with different thicknes...

Modeling and evaluation of a high‐resolution CMOS detector for cone‐beam CT of the extremities

“…The escape fraction refers to the fraction of optical photons that reach the scintillator exit surface and are subsequently coupled to the photodiode with efficiency . An linear fit to escape fraction estimated by Howansky et al . for a scintillator with reflective backing was used to compute :…”

“…The escape fraction g esc ðt CsI ; zÞ refers to the fraction of optical photons that reach the scintillator exit surface and are subsequently coupled to the photodiode with efficiency g 4 . An linear fit to escape fraction estimated by Howansky et al 57 for a scintillator with reflective backing was used to compute g esc : TABLE I. Glossary of terms and symbols in the cascaded systems model. Model constants include fundamental physical quantities, geometry and typical operating parameters of the extremity CBCT system, and detector parameters that are independent of CsI:Tl thickness.…”

An apparatus and method for directly measuring the depth‐dependent gain and spatial resolution of turbid scintillators

“…Ginzburg and Dick have measured average gains of = 35 keV −1 and 28 keV −1 in the Regular and Fast Back screens, respectively. As we have shown in previous work, PHS gain measurements are weighted by the number of x rays interacting at each depth within a scintillator, therefore is dominated by , that is, the gain at depths furthest from the light sensor. We have measured = 42 keV −1 in the Regular and = 26 keV −1 in the Fast Back, which agree reasonably well with their respective PHS measurements of = 35 keV −1 and 28 keV −1 .…”

“…As the most upstream component in the image detection chain, the properties of the scintillator used in an I‐FPD define the upper limit to its DQE. Consequently, it is critical to understand how scintillator design factors (e.g., material, thickness, optical backing) affect their imaging properties, so that the performance of I‐FPDs can be maximized at low imaging dose …”

Toward Scintillator High‐Gain Avalanche Rushing Photoconductor Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (SHARP‐AMFPI): Initial fabrication and characterization

“…The thickness of CsI has been investigated from 150 to 1000 μm. It has been shown that thicker columnar CsI can provide higher quantum efficiency with minimal penalty on the swank factor . Increasing the thickness of CsI will also reduce the risk of direct interactions in the a‐Se.…”