Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1999
DOI: 10.1145/312624.312679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving concept hierarchies from text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
146
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
146
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested four different methods: 1) the classic subsumption method [8,13], mentioned in section 2.3.1 (labelled S); 2) the original Klink algorithm, as described in [11] (labelled K); 3) a first version of Klink-2, with the ability of integrating multiple relationships, but not addressing ambiguous keywords (labelled KR); 4) the final version of Klink-2, with also the ability to detect and split ambiguous keywords in contextual mode (labelled K2); The co-occurrence graph derived from Scopus was enriched by exploiting the cooccurrences on Google Scholar and Wikipedia, as described in [11]. KR and K2 used six statistical relationships computed on the Scopus dataset, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We tested four different methods: 1) the classic subsumption method [8,13], mentioned in section 2.3.1 (labelled S); 2) the original Klink algorithm, as described in [11] (labelled K); 3) a first version of Klink-2, with the ability of integrating multiple relationships, but not addressing ambiguous keywords (labelled KR); 4) the final version of Klink-2, with also the ability to detect and split ambiguous keywords in contextual mode (labelled K2); The co-occurrence graph derived from Scopus was enriched by exploiting the cooccurrences on Google Scholar and Wikipedia, as described in [11]. KR and K2 used six statistical relationships computed on the Scopus dataset, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of approaches for learning taxonomies or ontologies, including natural language processing [21], clustering techniques [22], statistical methods [13], and methods based on spreading activation [19]. Text2Onto [21] is a popular system for learning ontologies, which represents the learned ontological structures in a probabilistic ontology model and uses natural language processing techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations