2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44618-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving Bisimulation Congruences for Reactive Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
206
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are fundamental problems, mainly caused by graphs having non-trivial automorphisms (see, e.g., the counterexample in [13] on pages 80/81, which can be directly transferred into our framework). We believe, however, that our construction is very close in spirit to the notion of relative pushouts introduced by Leifer and Milner and that it should be possible to show the equivalence of these two notions in a suitable graph category with support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there are fundamental problems, mainly caused by graphs having non-trivial automorphisms (see, e.g., the counterexample in [13] on pages 80/81, which can be directly transferred into our framework). We believe, however, that our construction is very close in spirit to the notion of relative pushouts introduced by Leifer and Milner and that it should be possible to show the equivalence of these two notions in a suitable graph category with support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the idea which was formulated in the papers of Leifer/Milner [13,14], Sewell [24] and Sassone/Sobocinski [23] is to automatically derive a labelled…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The question as to whether or not term a in context c manifests a redex l becomes now whether there exists a suitable context d such that ca = dl. This allows us to express the minimality of c by ranging over all equations of the kind c a = d l, seeking for unique ways to factor c through c. In §2 we recall how such universal property is elegantly expressed by the notion of idem-relative-pushout, a breakthrough due Leifer and Milner [4]. Remarkably, such formalisation supports the central 'congruence theorem' that bisimulation on the labelled transition systems derived following the theory is a congruence, i.e., it is closed under all contexts.…”
Section: A An a B A(n) B A | B A | Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is no unique mediation between the squares in the slice of 1: By an idem-relative-pushout [4] we mean the (square) diagram in C obtained by applying the forgetful functor U W : C/W → C (which projects V, r to V) to a pushout diagram in C/W. Let I denote the class of IPOs in C.…”
Section: Lemma 2 Pap Has Slice Pushoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%