The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12551-011-0045-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving biomedical diagnostics from NMR spectroscopic data

Abstract: Biomedical spectroscopic experiments generate large volumes of data. For accurate, robust diagnostic tools the data must be analyzed for only a few characteristic observations per subject, and a large number of subjects must be studied. We describe here two of the current data analytic approaches applied to this problem: SIMCA (principal component analysis, partial least squares), and the statistical classification strategy (SCS). We demonstrate the application of the SCS by three examples of its use in analyz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended cohort size will depend somewhat on the nature of the data, but anything less than several hundred subjects, both healthy subjects and those with the condition of interest, would not yield a classifier that would be certified for use by a regulatory agency. A detailed discussion of these issues has appeared recently (176,177).In addition, validation of MR spectroscopy biomarkers for clinical use requires their incorporation in robust prospective multicenter clinical trials, where patient selection and treatment meets prespecified criteria and the statistical methodology is set before the trial commences. This requires careful MR spectroscopy protocol design that can be adhered to at all the participating centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended cohort size will depend somewhat on the nature of the data, but anything less than several hundred subjects, both healthy subjects and those with the condition of interest, would not yield a classifier that would be certified for use by a regulatory agency. A detailed discussion of these issues has appeared recently (176,177).In addition, validation of MR spectroscopy biomarkers for clinical use requires their incorporation in robust prospective multicenter clinical trials, where patient selection and treatment meets prespecified criteria and the statistical methodology is set before the trial commences. This requires careful MR spectroscopy protocol design that can be adhered to at all the participating centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower accuracy solution will also be more robust: challenging the resultant classifier with new specimens will yield accuracy similar to that found by a reliable classifier. 5 and enhanced diagnostic potential of MR metabolomics. In a study by Li et al, 12 HRMAS 1 H MRS studies were performed on 31 breast tissue samples (13 cancer and 18 non-cancer) obtained by percutaneous core needle biopsy.…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INTERPRET DSS (version 3.0) allows radiologists, medical physicists, biochemists or anyone with a minimum knowledge of what an MR spectrum is, to enter their own SV raw data, acquired at 1. 5 T, and to analyze them. 89 The system is expected to help in the categorization of MR spectra from abnormal brain masses.…”
Section: Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations