1957
DOI: 10.1037/h0042640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving a measure of test-taking defensiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Messick, 1959). Although this and some other reported relationships are somewhat equivocal because the measures of desirability used were partially confounded with acquiescence, e.g., Edwards' SD Scale and Hanley's Ex Scale, high correlations have also been reported between~fr{PI scales and desirability measures having a balanced number of true and false items (Edwards, 1957;Hanley, 1957;Wiggins & Rumrill, 1959).…”
Section: Acquiescence and The Factorial Interpretation Of The: Mmpi Imentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Messick, 1959). Although this and some other reported relationships are somewhat equivocal because the measures of desirability used were partially confounded with acquiescence, e.g., Edwards' SD Scale and Hanley's Ex Scale, high correlations have also been reported between~fr{PI scales and desirability measures having a balanced number of true and false items (Edwards, 1957;Hanley, 1957;Wiggins & Rumrill, 1959).…”
Section: Acquiescence and The Factorial Interpretation Of The: Mmpi Imentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Edwards, 1957;De, Seto & Kuethe, 1959;Fordyce, 1956;Hanley, 1956;Hanley, 1957;Taylor, 1959;loTiggins & Rumrill, 1959). Fordyce (1956, for example, has noted a marked similarity between loadings on the largest MlY"1PI factor from vlheeler, Little, and Lehner t s (1951) psychiatric sample and correlations of MMPI scales with a measure of desirability.…”
Section: Acquiescence and The Factorial Interpretation Of The: Mmpi Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McClosky & Meehl, 1952); #280 Social Responsibility, Revised (Gough, McClosky & Meehl, 1957); #281 Suspicion (Tryon, Stein, & Chu, 1968); #319 Motivation to Change (Volsky, Magoon, Norman & Hoyt, 1965); #320 Neuropsychiatric Hospitalization Chronicity (Anker, 1961); #321 Prediction of Change (Schofield, 1950); #328 Headache Proneness (Archibald, 1955); #331 Suicide Key (Simon & Hales, 1949); #332 Threat Suicide (Farberow & Devries, 1967); #428 Test-taking Defensiveness (Hanley, 1957); #429 Social Desirabililty (Fordyce, 1956); #430 Social Desirability, Revised (Edwards, 1957); #431 Non-overlapping, Purified Social Desirability (Adams & Horn. 1965); #432 Social Desirability (Wiggins, 1959): #433 Social Desirability (A Scale) (Wiggins & Rumrill, 1959); #434 Social Desirability (R Scale Males) (Wiggins & Rumrill, 1959).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items in between, for which approximately half the normative group responds "true" and half "false," are said to be high 'in Il cont r over si ali t y" (Fricke, 1956;Hanley, 1957), a ,condition more suitable for eliciting acquiescence. This conception of communality is very similar to the interpretation of factor II stressed in the present paper, in which the consistent endorsement of desirable vs.…”
Section: Reliabilities and Intercorrelationsmentioning
confidence: 99%