2017
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x16008344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derived Knörrer periodicity and Orlov’s theorem for gauged Landau–Ginzburg models

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a Knörrer periodicity type equivalence between derived factorization categories of gauged LG models, which is an analogy of a theorem proved by Shipman and Isik independently. As an application, we obtain a gauged LG version of Orlov's theorem describing a relationship between categories of graded matrix factorizations and derived categories of hypersurfaces in projective spaces, by combining the above Knörrer periodicity type equivalence and the theory of variations of GIT quotients due to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Φ P ⊣ Φ P R by Proposition 4.47, this isomorphism implies that the functor Φ P : Dcoh(X 1 , W 1 ) → Dcoh(X 2 , W 2 ) is fully faithful by [13,Lemma 4.6]. If the integral functor Φ j * (P ) : D b (cohX 1 ) → D b (cohX 2 ) is an equivalence, its left adjoint functor Φ j * (P ) L is fully faithful.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 52mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since Φ P ⊣ Φ P R by Proposition 4.47, this isomorphism implies that the functor Φ P : Dcoh(X 1 , W 1 ) → Dcoh(X 2 , W 2 ) is fully faithful by [13,Lemma 4.6]. If the integral functor Φ j * (P ) : D b (cohX 1 ) → D b (cohX 2 ) is an equivalence, its left adjoint functor Φ j * (P ) L is fully faithful.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 52mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…, we may just use objects of the form det(E) ⊗ L ⊗n | Z(taut) . Finally, under the equivalence (see Theorem 3.6 of [Hir16]),…”
Section: Crepant Categorical Resolutions Via Lg Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The following theorem is originally due to Isik [Isi13] and Shipman [Shi12] and due to Hirano [Hir16] in the G-equivariant case, which is the case we will use. Theorem 3.5 (Proposition 4.8 of [Hir16]). Assume that w is a regular section of E. There is an equivalence of categories,…”
Section: Crepant Categorical Resolutions Via Lg Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theorem is originally due to independently to Isik [Isi13] and Shipman [Shi12]. With the G-action, it is a special of Theorem 1.2 of [Hir16].…”
Section: Categories Of Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%