2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derived Galois deformation rings

Abstract: We define a derived version of Mazur's Galois deformation ring. It is a pro-simplicial ring R classifying deformations of a fixed Galois representation to simplicial coefficient rings; its zeroth homotopy group π0R recovers Mazur's deformation ring.We give evidence that these rings R occur in the wild: For suitable Galois representations, the Langlands program predicts that π0R should act on the homology of an arithmetic group. We explain how the Taylor-Wiles method can be used to upgrade such an action to a g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…an example of the main theorem of [36]. Note that it is not obvious that the action of Tor R loc p * (R S , R loc p (σ )) on H * (X K 0 U p , σ • ) m is independent of the choice of non-principal ultrafilter made to carry out the patching.…”
Section: Arithmetic Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an example of the main theorem of [36]. Note that it is not obvious that the action of Tor R loc p * (R S , R loc p (σ )) on H * (X K 0 U p , σ • ) m is independent of the choice of non-principal ultrafilter made to carry out the patching.…”
Section: Arithmetic Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will make assumptions very close to [14, Conjecture 6.1]. We briefly summarize them and refer the reader to [14] for full details:…”
Section: Assumptions About Galois Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for (respectively) the étale cohomology of M (equivalently the group cohomology of GalpQ S {Qq with coefficients in M ), and the subset of this group consisting of classes 14 Why the coadjoint representation rather than the adjoint? They are isomorphic for G semisimple, at least away from small characteristic.…”
Section: Selmer Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) geometrically, for varieties over local fields: they can be defined for any algebraic variety over K [58], [27] under the name of syntomic cohomology groups and are used as an approximation of p-adic motivic cohomology (a refinement of p-adic étale cohomology capturing classes coming from geometry); (2) globally (over number fields): they can be globalized and extended to all H i (and not only H 1 ); see [60] for a direct construction and [44] for reinterpretations via derived Galois deformation rings.…”
Section: Number-theoretical Applications the Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%