1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0022226700016698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derived constituent order in unbounded dependency constructions

Abstract: This paper proposes that unbounded dependency constructions in English instantiate a surface subject-predicate structure in which the predicate is typically discontinuous. Evidence is presented supporting this discontinuous analysis over the operatorvariable structure conventionally assigned to unbounded dependencies. A model of phrase structure that sanctions discontinuous representations is outlined, along with a feature-based strategy for generating the proposed structures within an extended phrase structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This brings us to a host of proposals that invoke MD to capture movement dependencies. 8 This is the main insight behind the PHRASE-LINKING GRAMMAR of Peters & Ritchie (1981) (see also Engdahl 1986;Blevins 1990Blevins , 1994Gärtner 1999Gärtner , 2002, where movement configurations are represented through a node being shared between at least two parents (a TREE PARENT and a LINK PARENT, such that the former dominates the latter), without assuming either that structures are three-dimensional, or that (this version of) MD is restricted to coordination.…”
Section: P R O P O S a L : T H R E E T Y P E S O F Cwh Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings us to a host of proposals that invoke MD to capture movement dependencies. 8 This is the main insight behind the PHRASE-LINKING GRAMMAR of Peters & Ritchie (1981) (see also Engdahl 1986;Blevins 1990Blevins , 1994Gärtner 1999Gärtner , 2002, where movement configurations are represented through a node being shared between at least two parents (a TREE PARENT and a LINK PARENT, such that the former dominates the latter), without assuming either that structures are three-dimensional, or that (this version of) MD is restricted to coordination.…”
Section: P R O P O S a L : T H R E E T Y P E S O F Cwh Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the rules formulated in these models specified only the order of constituents in the output, with no information about the structure of these constituents. The notion that extraction constructions contained a dislocated filler ‘binding’ a gap provided the first general solution to the problem of assigning derived structure to transforms, though this solution is by no means empirically unproblematic (Blevins 1994).…”
Section: From Theories To Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%