2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derive empirical fragility functions for Nepali residential buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vulnerability matrix based on mean seismic index is established according to Table 3 and Formula (10), such as Formulas (11) and (12). Where is the damage ratio of BFSWMS in the state of damage level , when the seismic intensity CSIS= ; is mean seismic damage index as BFSWMS, when subjected to CSIS= , ( =6, 7,8,9,10,11…”
Section: Mean Damage Index (Mdi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vulnerability matrix based on mean seismic index is established according to Table 3 and Formula (10), such as Formulas (11) and (12). Where is the damage ratio of BFSWMS in the state of damage level , when the seismic intensity CSIS= ; is mean seismic damage index as BFSWMS, when subjected to CSIS= , ( =6, 7,8,9,10,11…”
Section: Mean Damage Index (Mdi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed maps of vulnerability distribution were established considering construction period, number of stories, material type and structural system factors , respectively. Gautam et al [7] combined with the seismic damage data of residential buildings in Nepali Bihar earthquake in 1934, Chainpur earthquake in 1980, Eastern earthquake in 2011 and Gorkha earthquake in 2015, the fragility curves under multiple seismic damage levels were given in literature [3][4][5][6][7]. The vulnerability matrices and curves considering multiple factors were established based on the seismic damage database of several typical violent earthquakes in the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the statistical analysis of vulnerability in the multiple intensity regions of the ms is established considering the mean damage index factor of the wenchuan earthquake [9]. Based on the survey data of the typical buildings damaged in several violent earthquakes worldwide, the vulnerability damage matrix considering the earthquake ground motion parameters is obtained by statistical analysis [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: @Qqcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, extensive earthquake damage data are used to generate fragility curves [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Postearthquake surveys of approximately 340000 reinforced concrete structures were used to derive fragility curves for a European seismic risk assessment scenario [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e observed damage to 9500 of low-rise residential buildings from earthquakes in South Iceland was studied by typological fragility curves [21]. Moreover, fragility curves were developed from millions of data on the basis of 665,515 building damage cases by earthquake in Nepal [22,23]. In Italy, the postearthquake damage surveys of approximately 90,000 buildings in order to derive fragility curves were considered [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%