2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
57
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(54 reference statements)
11
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that in the case of a clear semantic context it is easier to generate a competitive process because there are stronger connections between possible competitors. Note that this explanation is fully congruent with the results of Ford et al (2010) suggesting the independence of the Stem-FS and Affix-FS due to the former being semantic in nature but not the latter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that in the case of a clear semantic context it is easier to generate a competitive process because there are stronger connections between possible competitors. Note that this explanation is fully congruent with the results of Ford et al (2010) suggesting the independence of the Stem-FS and Affix-FS due to the former being semantic in nature but not the latter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, when they carried out an analysis without counting the opaque members of the morphological family, the FS effect appeared for all morphemes. Ford et al (2010), on the other hand, observed that FS of stems and FS of affixes are independent variables in English. They carried out a multiple regression analysis and observed that both variables were good predictors of response latencies obtained in a lexical decision task, but there was no interaction between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that phonotactics should be related in this way to morphological decomposability has been noted before (Burzio, ) and is in line with findings showing that processing is easier when the various properties of a complex word agree in their effects on parsability (Burani & Thornton, ; Ford, Davis, & Marslen‐Wilson, ; Hay, ; Kuperman, Bertram, & Baayen, ; Kuperman et al., ; Lázaro, ; Milin et al., ; Moscoso del Prado Martín et al., ; Taft, ). Moreover, this tendency has been argued to drive patterns in morphology, phonology, and even orthography, including affix ordering (Hay, ; Hay & Plag, ; Plag & Baayen, ; Zirkel, ; as well as other contributions in the same special issue), stress in Spanish compound words (Rao, ), allomorphy in Russian genitives (Pertsova, ), optional phonological processes in Tagalog (Zuraw, , ), and the spelling of English compounds and derivations (Berg, ; Kuperman & Bertram, ).…”
Section: Spanish Alternating Stems With Derivational Suffixessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This sug gests that family size and base frequency are independent predic tors of RTs (Ford et al, 2010). Given that the family size was composed of the number of transparent morphological relatives, family size did not interact with transparency (b = -0.078, SE = 0.02, Id = .19, p > .05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To incorporate these effects into the AUSTRAL model, we could attribute the family size effect to the semantic level (Ford et al, 2010;Schreuder & Baayen, 1997), where the shared seman tic units for words with a large family size are more frequently accessed and provide stronger activation feedback to the lemma level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%