2006
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/48/3/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of the pure Faraday and Cotton–Mouton effects when polarimetric effects in a tokamak are large

Abstract: When polarimetric effects are large the Cotton-Mouton and Faraday effects do not combine linearly and it is not possible to separate exactly the pure Cotton-Mouton effect W 1 and the pure Faraday effect, W 3 . Four alternative approximate expressions for W 1 and W 3 in terms of measurable quantities are examined for tokamak configurations.Two of these approximations proposed recently are found to be preferable, some previous statements concerning them are corrected and the errors incurred by their use are eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expressions (44)−(47) are similar to the Segre's results [20,21], obtained for rectilinear rays, but in contrast to the latter they are applicable to the wave propagation along curved rays with a torsion. Furthermore, some explicit distinctions are observed.…”
Section: Stokes Vector Evolution In a Magnetized Plasmasupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expressions (44)−(47) are similar to the Segre's results [20,21], obtained for rectilinear rays, but in contrast to the latter they are applicable to the wave propagation along curved rays with a torsion. Furthermore, some explicit distinctions are observed.…”
Section: Stokes Vector Evolution In a Magnetized Plasmasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In particular, the papers [20,21] do not contain the term with Q in Eq. (44) (it can be substantial when u is not small) and the elements of matrix (45) is twice as large as compared with the corresponding matrix elements in [20,21] (the reason is an arithmetic inaccuracy in [20]). Note also that difference in signs in some terms is related to the sign difference in the definition of 3 S .…”
Section: Stokes Vector Evolution In a Magnetized Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown recently [14,15] that equations for the Stokes vector evolution can be derived from a quasi-isotropic approximation of geometrical optics, and they are very close in form to the equations suggested in [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In contrast to SVF, QIA stems from Maxwell's equations, using an asymptotic expansion of the wave field in small parameter µ A .…”
Section: Equation For the Stokes Vector Evolution Derived From Qiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…QIA was developed in-depth in subsequent publications [4,5] and briefly outlined in books [6,7]. An alternative approach -the Stokes vector formalism (SVF) -was suggested by Azzam [8] and further developed by Segre for the purposes of plasma polarimetry [9][10][11][12][13]. This paper analyzes interrelations between the QIA approach and the Stokes vector formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following discussion concerning the comparison between measurements and model calculations, the Guenther Model A [4] will be cited as well: a discussion of the details of this model is given in [2,5]. This model is the analytic solution of Stokes equations in the limit of…”
Section: Stokes Equations and Their Approximate Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%