1996
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation and Application of an Otariid Utility Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Binford, such indices provide an economic ''frame of reference '' (1987: 453) against which butchery, transport and utilization of animal carcasses may be examined. To date, however, utility indices have been derived primarily for terrestrial mammals [see summary and discussion in Lyman (1994: 225-234)], and it is only recently that attention has been directed to marine mammals, specifically pinnipeds [harp and hooded seals combined as one phocid seal index- (Lyman, Savelle & Whitbridge, 1992); ringed seals- (Mason, Gerlach & Diab, 1993); sea lions for an otariid seal index- (Savelle, Friesen & Lyman, 1996)]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Binford, such indices provide an economic ''frame of reference '' (1987: 453) against which butchery, transport and utilization of animal carcasses may be examined. To date, however, utility indices have been derived primarily for terrestrial mammals [see summary and discussion in Lyman (1994: 225-234)], and it is only recently that attention has been directed to marine mammals, specifically pinnipeds [harp and hooded seals combined as one phocid seal index- (Lyman, Savelle & Whitbridge, 1992); ringed seals- (Mason, Gerlach & Diab, 1993); sea lions for an otariid seal index- (Savelle, Friesen & Lyman, 1996)]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for seal food utility (FUI), skeletal element representation (%MAU) and percent carnivore damage for each element. Food utility data (FUI) from Savelle et al (1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is important to evaluate the taphonomic history of an assemblage to understand whether the patterns in skeletal-part frequencies are due to past butchery and transport practices or to taphonomic processes. For example, to examine whether carcass parts were being transported back to the site based on their nutritional value, we can compare the relative skeletal abundance (%MAU) of each element with its utility (FUI, Savelle et al 1996). Analysis of the Twilight Beach fur-seal data shows that skeletal-element abundance is not correlated with food utility at an ordinal level (r s = -0.301, p = 0.34; without outlier r s = -0.409, p = 0.21).…”
Section: Carcass Exploitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences between an otariid seal and a ringed seal; and Savelle, Friesen & Lyman, 1996). Detailed studies on the biology, physiology, ecology, and behaviour of the ringed seal may be found in Howell (1929), McLaren (1958, Bryden (1972), T. G. Smith (1973Smith ( , 1987, Frost & Lowry (1981), Smith & Hammill (1981), Finley, Miller & Koski (1983), Burns & Frost (1988), and Kelley (1988).…”
Section: Ringed Seal Meat Utility Indexmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This general concept has been accepted by archaeologists (e.g. Blumenschine & Caro, 1986;Brink & Dawe, 1989;Borrero, 1990;Kooyman, 1990;Lyman, Savelle & Whitridge, 1992;Emerson, 1993;Savelle, 1995;Savelle, Friesen & Lyman, 1996;see Lyman, 1994: 223-293, and various articles in Hudson, 1993 for details). Ethnoarchaeologists have corroborated some of Binford's findings in that transport decisions reflect ''trade-offs'' (Metcalfe & Barlow, 1991) between nutritional considerations, processing efficiency, and the weight of a carcass part (O'Connell, Hawkes & Blurton Jones, 1988;Savelle, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%