2014
DOI: 10.1075/silv.15.03stu
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derhoticisation in Scottish English: A sociophonetic journey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A straightforward interpretation of these data would be that some speakers were ‘less competent’ than others so did not produce all phonemes, especially as their respective L1s all have only one rhotic phoneme. Such an interpretation might also argue that speakers from Glasgow demonstrate substantial influence from their L1 English, which previous research has shown to be undergoing derhoticisation (Lawson, Stuart‐Smith and Scobbie ; Stuart‐Smith, Lawson and Scobbie ). However, we believe that this interpretation does not fully explain our results for several reasons: firstly, many of these speakers worked in Gaelic‐essential employment where proficiency in Gaelic was a natural part of their job.…”
Section: Analysis: Rhotics In New and Traditional Speakersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A straightforward interpretation of these data would be that some speakers were ‘less competent’ than others so did not produce all phonemes, especially as their respective L1s all have only one rhotic phoneme. Such an interpretation might also argue that speakers from Glasgow demonstrate substantial influence from their L1 English, which previous research has shown to be undergoing derhoticisation (Lawson, Stuart‐Smith and Scobbie ; Stuart‐Smith, Lawson and Scobbie ). However, we believe that this interpretation does not fully explain our results for several reasons: firstly, many of these speakers worked in Gaelic‐essential employment where proficiency in Gaelic was a natural part of their job.…”
Section: Analysis: Rhotics In New and Traditional Speakersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The regression models for the innovations in wordlist speech showed much higher explanation of variance than for those in conversational speech. Similar regression analyses were carried out for the first two formants of the vowels, but these showed predominantly linguistic factors to be significant. The regression results for the derhoticisation of postvocalic /r/ was split according to speech style (Stuart‐Smith, Lawson and Scobbie ). In conversational speech, nonrhotic variation appears to be constrained only by linguistic factors; no social factors were significant.…”
Section: Media and Diffusing Innovations: Some Evidence From Glasgowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent evidence shows that derhoticisation is also promoted by indirect engagement with Anglo-English shown in television soap dramas (e.g. Stuart-Smith et al 2014). After a long period of near stability, derhoticisation may be taking off (again).…”
Section: /R/ In the Berliner Lautarchiv Samplementioning
confidence: 99%