“…It is known that fungal secondary metabolism is affected by many environmental factors, such as light Babitha et al, 2008, medium composition Hewage et al, 2014and pH Miao et al, 2006, temperature and moisture Bacon et al, 1973, CO 2 El-Sabbagh et al, 2008 and O 2 concentrations Lai et al, 2005 , and agitation rate Kim et al, 2002 besides fungal morphology such as pelleted, filamentous, and clump forms Du et al, 2003 . Moreover, while the style of cultivation system, i.e., submerged cultivation SmC , liquid-surface cultivation LSC and solid-state cultivation SSC systems, also affects on the production of fungal metabolites Asaff et al, 2006 , carbon catabolite repression drastically decrease the production of enzymes and secondary metabolites only in the SmC Aguilar et al, 2001 . Recently, the authors have reported that fungal cells growing on an interface between a hydrophobic organic solvent and a liquid medium can produce characteristic hydrophobic secondary metabolites which are not produced in the SmC Oda et al, 2015 . The interface cultivation system, an extractive liquid-surface immobilization Ext-LSI system comprising a hydrophobic organic solvent upper phase , a fungal cell-microsphere mat middle phase , and a liquid medium lower phase , has also some unique and practically important characteristics, such as derepression of carbon catabolite repression Oda et al, 2012a and remarkably high productivity of lipophilic secondary metabolites Oda et al, 2009;Oda et al, 2012b . On the other hand, many microorganisms containing FIG. 1 Strategy for the estimation of secondary metabolite profiles among submerged and agar-solvent interfacial cultivation, and extractive liquid-surface immobilization system.…”