“…In continental Europe, use of the Rappaport classification remained scanty, and in the early seventies the Kiel classification, differentiating NHL by modern histo-and cytopathology and immunology, has been widely accepted by pathologists so that detailed studies of its clinical and prognostic implications became necessary. From 1973 to 1975, a retrospective investigation on 405 patients performed by the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group (KLSG) comprising 21 hospitals in West Germany and Austria (Brittinger et al, 1976Stacher et al, 1976;Bremer et al, 1977), and data published by other groups (Diihmke, 1976;Musshoff et al, 1976;Diihmke and Quack, 1977;Delbriick et al, 1978;Meuge et al, 1978) showed that the subdivision by the Kiel classification of NHL into two major histopathological groups (NHL of low-grade and high-grade malignancy) as well as into several lymphoma entities subsumed under these headings has prognostic relevance. Since, however, several questions such as the prognostic relevance of histopathological subclassifications of certain lymphoma entities or the initial stage of disease could not be answered by these investigations, in 1975 the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group initiated a prospective multicenter observation study.…”