„Der späte Nietzsche“ Schreibprozess und Heftedition

Röllin, Beat; Haase, Marie-Luise; Stockmar, René; Trenkle, Franziska

doi:10.30965/9783846744703_007

Schreibprozesse 2008

DOI: 10.30965/9783846744703_007

|View full text |Cite

„Der späte Nietzsche“ Schreibprozess und Heftedition

Beat Röllin¹,

Marie-Luise Haase²,

René Stockmar³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Parkhurst

2020

Nietzsche-Studien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a review of the literature and historical evidence, I argue that the use of the methodological principle known as the priority principle in Anglo-American Nietzsche scholarship is inconsistent and irreconcilable with historical evidence. It attempts to demarcate between the published works and the Nachlass. However, there are no agreed upon necessary and sufficient conditions of a particular textual object being considered “Nachlass.” This absence leads to implicit and often tacit value demarcation criteria that can be broadly grouped into four types of consideration: publication, authorization, publicness, and audience. Each of these criteria pick out a different set of texts as “Nachlass.” Thus, despite the veneer of agreement, the most broadly accepted methodological approach in the Anglo-American tradition of Nietzsche scholarship is applied inconsistently. I argue that we must either offer necessary and sufficient conditions for a piece of text being Nachlass, or we ought to abandon such abstract criteria altogether and embrace a contextual and historical approach. I then argue that the first option is impossible given historical evidence. I conclude this article by explicating several recent German approaches to the Nachlass which I think can offer a new possible approach.

show abstract

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Parkhurst

2020

Nietzsche-Studien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

„Der späte Nietzsche“ Schreibprozess und Heftedition

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About