1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00993515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Ovipositor der Hydradephaga (Coleoptera) und seine phylogenetische Bedeutung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Dytiscidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to morphological evidence (Burmeister, 1976;Ruhnau and Brancucci, 1984;Ruhnau, 1986;Beutel, 1994Beutel, , 1998, which considered the Copelatinae to be basal within Dytiscidae, they are placed in a more derived position, near Laccophilinae and Dytiscinae. Similarly, there is no evidence for the relationship between Agabetinae and Laccophilinae, as suggested by Burmeister (1976Burmeister ( , 1990a, Nilsson (1989), andMiller (2001). The position of Laccophilinae, however, remains uncertain based on 18S rRNA, but it is generally placed as derived within the non-Hydroporinae clade and never sister to Hydroporinae, as suggested by Wolfe (1985) and Ruhnau and Brancucci (1984).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to morphological evidence (Burmeister, 1976;Ruhnau and Brancucci, 1984;Ruhnau, 1986;Beutel, 1994Beutel, , 1998, which considered the Copelatinae to be basal within Dytiscidae, they are placed in a more derived position, near Laccophilinae and Dytiscinae. Similarly, there is no evidence for the relationship between Agabetinae and Laccophilinae, as suggested by Burmeister (1976Burmeister ( , 1990a, Nilsson (1989), andMiller (2001). The position of Laccophilinae, however, remains uncertain based on 18S rRNA, but it is generally placed as derived within the non-Hydroporinae clade and never sister to Hydroporinae, as suggested by Wolfe (1985) and Ruhnau and Brancucci (1984).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The most basal clades of both groups belong to tribes Hyphydrini, Hydrovatini, and Laccornini, the latter two also considered basal within Hydroporinae by Burmeister (1976), Wolfe (1985Wolfe ( , 1988, Alarie and Harper (1988), Wolfe and Roughley (1990), and Alarie (1991). However, the largest tribe, Hydroporini, is not found to be monophyletic in any of the trees, but groups into four main clades: the Hydroporus group, the Graptodytes group (sensu Seidlitz, 1887), the Hygrotus group, and the two Australian genera (Paroster and Necterosoma).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the remaining genera of the Deronectes gr., Nebrioporus is sister to the clade formed by Scarodytes and the species of the Stictotarsus duodecimpustulatus group, a relationship already suggested on the basis of the study of the female reproductive system by Burmeister (1976) and, partly, Nilsson & Angus (1992) (these authors considered Stictotarsus monophyletic and sister to Nebrioporus plus Scarodytes). Within the genus Nebrioporus, the species of the N. ceresyi gr.…”
Section: Taxonomic Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of a valvifer in members of Laccornis indicates a plesiotypic position for that genus (Burmeister 1976, Wolfe 1985. This is an internal character that is part of a complex muscular/structural system (see Burmeister 1976) and I consider it very significant. Furthermore, according to the phylogeny (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burmeister 1976Burmeister , 1980Brancucci andRuhnau 1985, Dettner 1985). This paper is the fifth in a series on primitive hydroporine genera (Wolfe and Matta 1981;Wolfe 1985;Roughley and Wolfe, in press; press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%