Abstract:ZusammenfassungBildungspolitik und Bildungsadministration bemühen sich verstärkt um Lehrkräfte mit Migrationshintergrund. Es wird angenommen, dass diese Lehrkräfte einen positiven Effekt auf Schülerinnen und Schüler mit Migrationshintergrund haben oder zumindest günstigere Einstellungen gegenüber dem Umgang mit Heterogenität aufweisen. Diese Einstellungen sollen sich dann wiederum positiv auf die Unterrichtsgestaltung auswirken. Solche normativen Erwartungen spiegeln sich in unterschiedlichen nationalen wie in… Show more
“…We encourage future studies to test whether the endorsement of different forms of color-evasiveness varies as a result of a migration experience or background. A recent study conducted among pre-service teachers in Germany found that teachers with a migration background showed more favorable attitudes towards dealing with diversity than non-immigrant pre-service teachers (Syring et al 2019). Lastly, our findings must not be generalized to teaching behaviors, as our dependent variable in Study 2 referred to psychosocial functioning in culturally diverse classrooms.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
The color-evasive ideology (commonly termed “colorblindness”) proposes that ethnic and cultural group memberships should be deemphasized. Yet there is a conceptual confusion around the meaning and measurement of color-evasiveness, and this construct is not used consistently in the international as well as German literature. Our purpose is to investigate whether two underlying forms of the color-evasive ideology (i.e., stressing similarities and ignoring differences) are two distinct, albeit related, constructs. We tested this hypothesis by applying these two forms of the color-evasive ideology to teachers’ cultural diversity beliefs. In two cross-sectional field studies conducted with pre-service teachers (Study 1, n = 210), and in-service teachers (Study 2, n = 99), questionnaire items on the stressing similarities ideology and items on the ignoring differences ideology loaded on two separate factors, providing a better fit to the data than the one-factor model. Mean scores on these two types of color-evasive ideology also differed substantially, indicating that participants across the two studies mainly endorsed the stressing similarities perspective. The stressing similarities and ignoring differences ideologies related differently to other intergroup ideologies (i.e., multiculturalism and polyculturalism), and showed different patterns to psychosocial functioning in culturally diverse classrooms (i.e., cultural diversity-related stress).
“…We encourage future studies to test whether the endorsement of different forms of color-evasiveness varies as a result of a migration experience or background. A recent study conducted among pre-service teachers in Germany found that teachers with a migration background showed more favorable attitudes towards dealing with diversity than non-immigrant pre-service teachers (Syring et al 2019). Lastly, our findings must not be generalized to teaching behaviors, as our dependent variable in Study 2 referred to psychosocial functioning in culturally diverse classrooms.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
The color-evasive ideology (commonly termed “colorblindness”) proposes that ethnic and cultural group memberships should be deemphasized. Yet there is a conceptual confusion around the meaning and measurement of color-evasiveness, and this construct is not used consistently in the international as well as German literature. Our purpose is to investigate whether two underlying forms of the color-evasive ideology (i.e., stressing similarities and ignoring differences) are two distinct, albeit related, constructs. We tested this hypothesis by applying these two forms of the color-evasive ideology to teachers’ cultural diversity beliefs. In two cross-sectional field studies conducted with pre-service teachers (Study 1, n = 210), and in-service teachers (Study 2, n = 99), questionnaire items on the stressing similarities ideology and items on the ignoring differences ideology loaded on two separate factors, providing a better fit to the data than the one-factor model. Mean scores on these two types of color-evasive ideology also differed substantially, indicating that participants across the two studies mainly endorsed the stressing similarities perspective. The stressing similarities and ignoring differences ideologies related differently to other intergroup ideologies (i.e., multiculturalism and polyculturalism), and showed different patterns to psychosocial functioning in culturally diverse classrooms (i.e., cultural diversity-related stress).
“…Finally, Syring et al (2019) examined whether pre-service teachers "with and without a migration background differ in their attitudes towards dealing with social, ethnic-cultural and academic heterogeneity" (p. 201). Having interviewed 877 students, of which 169 "with a migration background", the authors conclude more favourable attitudes in the latter group: "lower costs and negative emotions, higher intrinsic motivation and perceived competence" (Syring et al, 2019) with regard to all three forms of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Ascriptions and (Self-)perception Of Minority Teachers' Role...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications should also include professionalization on dealing with multilingualism: Multilingual teachers must be prepared to endure antinomies and contradictions and to shape their own practice in them (Goltsev et al, 2022). Beneficial approaches might be those that enhance possible potentials of multilingual teachers (Rosen & Lengyel, 2012;Lengyel & Rosen, 2015;Putjata, 2018;Syring et al, 2019). These new directions should be implemented in all stages of teacher education starting with the university.…”
Section: Professional Integration and Teacher Educationmentioning
This chapter presents the state of the art focusing on the so-called teachers with “migration background” in Germany. Applying the method of the literature review, we summarize current and emerging research trends as well as understudied areas in Germany. The chapter provides the reader with a critical survey of the extensive literature produced in the past decade and a synthesis of current thinking on the topic at hand across disciplines and methodological approaches. The chapter opens up with a concise presentation of the context, objectives and the methodology of the study. These are followed by a critical synopsis of the findings and a closing conclusion. The results of the analysis reveal that a vast amount of research is focusing on the three following domains: Ascriptions and (Self-)perception of minority teachers’ role in education such as the responsibility of fostering the linguistic diversity) Minority teachers’ role for students and students’ own perspectives, e.g. the importance of the multilingual teachers for self-positioning of the students as migration-related multilinguals; as well as professional integration of minority teachers including access to the labour market and teacher education revealing an underrepresentation of minority teachers in schools. In the conclusion we point out new perspectives and areas in need of further research, such as the demand for new approaches on how to constructively include migration-related multilingualism in the course of teacher education.
“…As reported above, previous research from Germany suggests that immigrant teachers are supportive of students in general and of immigrant students in particular because they are less negatively biased toward immigrant students (Gegenfurtner, 2022 ; Glock & Kleen, 2019 ; Glock & Schuchart, 2020 ; Hachfeld et al, 2012 ; Kleen et al, 2019 ), more motivated to teach ethnically diverse school classes (Hachfeld et al, 2012 ; Syring et al, 2019 ), and endorse multicultural beliefs to a stronger extent (Hachfeld et al, 2012 ) than German ethnic majority teachers. However, studies investigating student outcomes did not find performance advantages when immigrant students were instructed by an immigrant (rather than a non-immigrant) teacher (Neugebauer & Klein, 2016 ; Neugebauer et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Research conducted in German schools also suggests that minority teachers can be particularly motivating, not only for immigrant students but for students of all backgrounds. Especially immigrant students can be expected to feel motivated and engaged by a teacher who enjoys teaching immigrant students, with (preservice or trainee) teachers with an immigrant background reporting more positive attitudes, more positive emotions, higher self-efficacy toward teaching ethnically diverse school classes (Hachfeld et al, 2012 ; Syring et al, 2019 ) and a stronger endorsement of cultural diversity (Hachfeld et al, 2012 ) than German ethnic majority teachers.…”
Can immigrant school students profit from an immigrant teacher sharing their minority background? We investigate preservice teachers' (Study 1; Mage = 26.29 years; 75.2% female) and school students' (Study 2; Mage = 14.88 years; 49.9% female) perceptions of a teacher as well as immigrant school students' learning gains (Study 2) by comparing four experimental video conditions in which a female teacher with a Turkish or German name instructs school students in a task while either saying that learning gains differed (stereotype activation) or did not differ (no stereotype activation) between immigrant and non-immigrant students. Study 1 shows that preservice teachers, regardless of their own cultural background, perceived the Turkish origin teacher as less biased, even when she voiced the stereotype, and as more motivationally supportive of school students in general than the German origin teacher. Study 2 shows that in contrast, among school students, the minority teacher was not perceived as less biased than the majority teacher. Rather, immigrant school students, in particular those with Turkish roots, were more concerned than students of the German majority that the teacher—irrespective of her background—was biased. Interestingly, these differences between students from different backgrounds disappeared when the teacher said that learning gains differed between immigrant and non-immigrant students. Immigrant school students of non-Turkish backgrounds, but not Turkish origin students suffered in their learning when instructed by the Turkish origin teacher who voiced the stereotype. We discuss implications for teacher recruitment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.