Männlichkeit Und Gewalt 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-91371-5_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der innere Gral der Männlichkeit: Zur männlichkeitskonstituierenden Funktion des Militärs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 This fits well with Ruth Seifert's claim that gendered difference is perceived as the most natural and inevitable in institutions of collective violence, with the following result: 'Der Krieger ist als Kriegerin kaum vorstellbar.' 59 And yet, as I want to argue, in their narrative (re)constructions of their revolutionary self, both Schiller and Viett do gesture towards a distinctly female revolutionary identity -a 'Kämpferin' identity of sorts -even if that construction is contradictory and, at times, reproduces the mainstream discourses that denied women political agency in the first place. I have already pointed to moments in both texts which function in that way: Viett's subversion of the 'coming of age' narrative for the woman revolutionary; Schiller's rewriting of the iconic photograph of her; Schiller's construction of a different, more convincing form of agency in her account of being 'terroristed'.…”
Section: Discursive Space and Revolutionary Identity In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 This fits well with Ruth Seifert's claim that gendered difference is perceived as the most natural and inevitable in institutions of collective violence, with the following result: 'Der Krieger ist als Kriegerin kaum vorstellbar.' 59 And yet, as I want to argue, in their narrative (re)constructions of their revolutionary self, both Schiller and Viett do gesture towards a distinctly female revolutionary identity -a 'Kämpferin' identity of sorts -even if that construction is contradictory and, at times, reproduces the mainstream discourses that denied women political agency in the first place. I have already pointed to moments in both texts which function in that way: Viett's subversion of the 'coming of age' narrative for the woman revolutionary; Schiller's rewriting of the iconic photograph of her; Schiller's construction of a different, more convincing form of agency in her account of being 'terroristed'.…”
Section: Discursive Space and Revolutionary Identity In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%