Der erste Brief an die Korinther

Conzelmann, Hans

doi:10.13109/9783666516207

Cited by 37 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, the details 16.Cf. Conzelmann (1981:134, n. 122), Collins (1999 and Lindemann (2000:136). Thiselton (2000:431) also refers to Chrysostom, Theophylact, Aquinas, �rasmus, Bengel, Theodoret, �rasmus and Calvin in this regard.…”

Section: Angels In the Letters To The Corinthiansmentioning

confidence: 99%

Angels as arguments? The rhetorical function of references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul

Tolmie

2011

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The issue investigated in this article is the rhetorical function fulfilled by the references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul. For this purpose all the references to angels in Galatians, 1 and 2 Corinthians and Romans are investigated systematically and thoroughly. This study shows that Paul never uses any of the references to angels as a main argument in these letters. Furthermore, it is shown that Paul refers to quite a variety of (possible) roles that angels might fulfil, or characteristics that angels possess. From a rhetorical perspective, it is evident that Paul mostly mentions angels in contexts that can broadly be typified as hyperbolic – in the sense that the extent or broad scope of the issue under discussion is emphasised.How to cite this article: Tolmie, D.F., 2011, ‘Angels as arguments? The rhetorical function of references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 67(1), Art. #825, 8 pages. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v67i1.825

show abstract

Section: Angels In the Letters To The Corinthiansmentioning

confidence: 99%

Angels as arguments? The rhetorical function of references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul

Tolmie

2011

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The theory that 1 Cor 14.34-35 is a non-Pauline interpolation dates back at least to the late nineteenth century (Holsten 1880, 2/1:404-5;Schmiedel 1892, 180-82). A leading candidate for introducing the interpolation theory to modern scholarship is Hans Conzelmann (1969Conzelmann ( , 1975. More recently, Gordon Fee and Philip Payne have energized the theory.…”

Section: Corinthians 1434-35 As An Interpolationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breaking the Rules: Lectio Brevior Potior and New Testament Textual Criticism

Miller

2019

The Bible Translator

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Though the principle regarding a preference for the shorter reading is often still included in descriptions of text-critical method, it has fallen out of use. The maxim lectio brevior potior ("prefer the shorter reading") should not be, and in fact is not, a factor in the modern practice of New Testament textual criticism. This article briefly states reasons for the maxim's inapplicability and then surveys a large amount of contemporary text-critical and exegetical literature to demonstrate the maxim's demise.

show abstract

“…Mit ej n sofiv a/ lov gou ist hier jedoch nicht allein 'Wortweisheit' 52 55 Paulus legt hier seiner Argumentation den Mythos über einstmals erschienene, jedoch abgewiesene und wieder entschwundene Weisheit zugrunde, die sich nun allein einem Kreis der Eingeweihten offenbart. 56 Der Offenbarung -hier ausgedrückt als Verkündigung (khv rugma V. 21, vgl.…”

Section: Die Diskussion Der Weisheitstheologie In 1 Kor 117-34unclassified

Weisheit in Joseph und Aseneth und den paulinischen Briefen

Standhartinger

2001

New Test. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many parallels in themes, phrases, and motifs have been detected between the Hellenistic-Jewish romance Joseph and Aseneth (JosAs) and the letters of Paul. This article argues that common motifs and also the specific theological profile originate in the same speculative or dualistic branch of wisdom theology. The first part detects wisdom theology as a basic structure of the narrative in JosAs. The second part argues for wisdom theology in Colossians, 1 Cor 1-2 and Phil 3. Paul contrasts wisdom and the cross. However, important motifs are shared by Paul with wisdom theology, and he formulates his Christology as wisdom theology in a dialectic fashion. Ausgehend von der biblischen Notiz Gen 41.45 erzählt der zu den jüdischhellenistischen Schriften der Zeitenwende 1 gehörende Roman Joseph und Aseneth (JosAs) die Geschichte der Bekehrung Aseneths, ihre Heirat mit Joseph und ihre Bewahrung vor feindlichen Anschlägen. Vielfach wurden seither traditionsgeschichtliche Beziehungen zwischen JosAs und den Paulusbriefen herausgearbeitet. 2 Zahlreiche sprachliche und thematische Parallelen zeigen die Aufnahme von Bekehrungsterminologie in den Paulusbriefen auf. 3 JosAs deutet dabei Bekehrung als Erneuerung und wieder zum Leben kommen (15.4(Ph)/15.5(B) vgl. 8.10-11(Ph)/8.9(B)). 4 Daher ist  New Test. Stud. , pp. -.

show abstract

Der erste Brief an die Korinther

Cited by 37 publications

References 0 publications

Angels as arguments? The rhetorical function of references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul

Angels as arguments? The rhetorical function of references to angels in the Main Letters of Paul

Breaking the Rules: Lectio Brevior Potior and New Testament Textual Criticism

Weisheit in Joseph und Aseneth und den paulinischen Briefen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About