1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf01425513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Endlichkeitssatz f�r eigentliche Abbildungen in der nichtarchimedischen Funktionentheorie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
6

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
29
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The rigid-analytic theorem on cohomology and base change (whose proof goes as in the algebraic case, with the help of [31]) implies that the natural map O S → f * O X is an isomorphism and that this property persists after any base change on S and (for quasi-separated or pseudo-separated S) any extension on the base field; we say O S = f * O X universally. Assume that there is given a section e ∈ X(S).…”
Section: Picard Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigid-analytic theorem on cohomology and base change (whose proof goes as in the algebraic case, with the help of [31]) implies that the natural map O S → f * O X is an isomorphism and that this property persists after any base change on S and (for quasi-separated or pseudo-separated S) any extension on the base field; we say O S = f * O X universally. Assume that there is given a section e ∈ X(S).…”
Section: Picard Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from this and a suitable cover of X by affinoid perfectoid subsets in X proét , one can deduce that H i (Xé t , O + X /p) is almost finitely generated over O K . At this point, one uses that X is proper, and in fact the proof of this finiteness result is inspired by the proof of finiteness of coherent cohomology of proper rigid-analytic varieties, as given by Kiehl [12]. Then one deduces finiteness results for the F p -cohomology by using a variant of the Artin-Schreier sequence…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we can not restrict ourselves to the case that O(Y ) has a noetherian ring of definition, since the nonarchimedean field k in Theorem 5.1 is not assumed to be discretely valued. Our proof of the GAGA theorem follows ideas of [14], [15], [20]. …”
Section: Gagamentioning
confidence: 99%