1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01851321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Einfluß des Perfusionsdruckes bei der Perfusionsfixation auf die Feinstruktur der Lebersinusoide. Transmissions- und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchung

Abstract: The fixation of rat liver by perfusion with glutaraldehyde with different pressures has been investigated. For this study adult male albino rats were used. Rat livers were fixed by perfusion through the abdominal aorta according to the method of FORSSMANN et al. (1967). Perfusion pressures varied from 30 to 210 mmHg. A continuous complete endothelial lining of liver sinusoids could be visualized with TEM and SEM after fixation with perfusion pressures lower than 100 mmHg. Three different regions could be notic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens in a very critical phase of preparation, since the sensitive, unfixed endothelial cell is influenced in different ways by the varying chemical composition, osmolarity, temperature, and pH of these rinsing solutions, as well as by the duration of the washing process itself. Instructions like Ringer's solution (Bjorkerud et al 1972), Ringer-glucose-solufion (Brylock et al 1977, NaCl (Dujovny et al 1978), lactated Ringer's solution (Thurston et al 1976), heparinized Tyrode-Procain solution (Frenzel et al 1976) or "isotonic balanced salt solution" ) are, therefore, too general and of little value in comparing different studies. The most typical rinsing solutions are:…”
Section: Washing and Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This happens in a very critical phase of preparation, since the sensitive, unfixed endothelial cell is influenced in different ways by the varying chemical composition, osmolarity, temperature, and pH of these rinsing solutions, as well as by the duration of the washing process itself. Instructions like Ringer's solution (Bjorkerud et al 1972), Ringer-glucose-solufion (Brylock et al 1977, NaCl (Dujovny et al 1978), lactated Ringer's solution (Thurston et al 1976), heparinized Tyrode-Procain solution (Frenzel et al 1976) or "isotonic balanced salt solution" ) are, therefore, too general and of little value in comparing different studies. The most typical rinsing solutions are:…”
Section: Washing and Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the perfusion method has prevailed more and more (Buss et al 1973, Buss and Hollweg 1977, Buss et al 1976, DeBruijn and VanMourik 1975, Edanaga 1974, Elemer et al 1976, Fishman et al 1975, Fonkalsrud et al 1976, Frenzel et al 1976, Hess and Staubli 1963, Shimamoto 1974, Svendsen and Jorgensen 1978, Webster et al 1974). Unfortunately there are also additional methodological variations and possibilities of error involved in this more complicated technique, making comparisons more difficult.…”
Section: Fixation Immersion or Perfusion Fixation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations