Ergotherapie Individualisiert Gestalten 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-55478-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Begriff »Lernen« im Kontext des K.U.R-Konzepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each study site, we selected 12 to 23 ash trees of varying health status (Table 1), which were easy to reach with a lifting platform. The health status of the trees was classi ed according to a scoring system for ash trees affected by ash dieback (Peters et al 2021). Class 0 represents a healthy tree without any infection symptoms and no disease-associated leaf loss.…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each study site, we selected 12 to 23 ash trees of varying health status (Table 1), which were easy to reach with a lifting platform. The health status of the trees was classi ed according to a scoring system for ash trees affected by ash dieback (Peters et al 2021). Class 0 represents a healthy tree without any infection symptoms and no disease-associated leaf loss.…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we assessed plot BB1 in Brandenburg in the winter of 2024. The basis for these scores was the assessment key for ash trees, which was developed at the beginning of the project (Peters et al 2021a;Peters et al 2021b). We analyzed winter assessments of the IBF with particular focus on stem collar necrosis.…”
Section: Optical and Acoustic Assessment (Scoring)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each plot has a core area of one hectare and contains at least 30 adult ash trees with a wide range of vitality and regeneration (Langer et al 2022). The health of all ash trees at IBF is visually assessed twice a year from the ground, starting in 2021, using the developed ash dieback assessment key (Peters et al 2021b;Peters et al 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%