2006
DOI: 10.1080/00927870600650291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth Two, Normality, and a Trace Ideal Condition for Frobenius Extensions

Abstract: Abstract.A ring extension A | B is depth two if its tensor-square satisfies a projectivity condition w.r.t. the bimodules AAB and B AA. In this case the structures (A ⊗B A)B and End B AB are bialgebroids over the centralizer CA(B) and there is a certain Galois theory associated to the extension and its endomorphism ring. We specialize the notion of depth two to induced representations of semisimple algebras and character theory of finite groups. We show that depth two subgroups over the complex numbers are nor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of D2 extensions include centrally projective algebra extensions (such as finite dimensional or finite projective algebras), H-separable extensions as well as pseudo-, group-, and Hopf-Galois extensions. For example, if A and B are the complex group algebras corresponding to a subgroup H < G of a finite group, then A | B is D2 if and only if H is a normal subgroup in G [11]. Also finitely generated weak Hopf-Galois extensions are left and right D2 [10].…”
Section: Preliminaries On D2 Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of D2 extensions include centrally projective algebra extensions (such as finite dimensional or finite projective algebras), H-separable extensions as well as pseudo-, group-, and Hopf-Galois extensions. For example, if A and B are the complex group algebras corresponding to a subgroup H < G of a finite group, then A | B is D2 if and only if H is a normal subgroup in G [11]. Also finitely generated weak Hopf-Galois extensions are left and right D2 [10].…”
Section: Preliminaries On D2 Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S and T. Thus the notion of depth two algebra extension recovers classical depth two for subfactors ( [17,19] for further details). Below we examine a pairing between S and T that becomes [19, 8.9] the Szymaǹski nondegenerate pairing of C A1 (B) and C A2 (A) in [18, (14)], which transfers the algebra structure of one centralizer to a coalgebra structure on the other when R is trivial.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The counit is given by ε(t) = μ(t)(1) = t 1 t 2 . We note that the representation μ is the module algebra R T and studied in [10,17] as a generalized Miyashta-Ulbrich action.…”
Section: Bialgebroids In Terms Of Anchor Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, even in the case of group algebra extensions these conditions cannot be translated in only group theoretical terms. Although the depth two subgroups are precisely the normal subgroups [8], a similar description is not yet known for any higher depth. For example, in [4] a sufficient condition for depth three was given but it is not yet known if that condition is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%