2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(02)01080-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth to Moho in Greenland: receiver-function analysis suggests two Proterozoic blocks in Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
95
6
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
19
95
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Moho map shown in Figure 14 (top) agrees well with the Moho map calculated by Braun et al (2007), for Greenland and its surrounding area. Also, a good agreement is found with the Moho depths calculated by Dahl-Jensen et al (2003), from receiver-function analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Moho map shown in Figure 14 (top) agrees well with the Moho map calculated by Braun et al (2007), for Greenland and its surrounding area. Also, a good agreement is found with the Moho depths calculated by Dahl-Jensen et al (2003), from receiver-function analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This information has been incorporated to the initial models, for the above-mentioned grid points (or blocks). Particularly, the Moho depths calculated by Dahl-Jensen et al (2003), for many places in Greenland, has been used to provide the Moho depth in the initial models, as well as the Moho depths predicted by the Moho map performed by Braun et al (2007). Thus, an initial model has been prepared for each grid point (or block) for depths ranging from 0 to 400 km.…”
Section: ̅ = Baxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For temporary passive experiments, this is even bigger problem, due to the limited number of events. Usually during 1 year of a campaign, only about few tens of good quality records, with magnitude M≥5.5, are collected Gregersen et al 2006;Wilde-Piórko et al 2008 (2005) and Geissler et al (2008) differ only by about ±1 km; however, in other regions, differences can reach more than ±5 km, as is the case for Greenland (Dahl-Jensen et al 2003;Kumar et al 2007). & In seismic refraction and wide angle reflection method observed PmP waves are weak for weak contrast at the Moho (gradient Moho zone).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Deviations Uncertainties And Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Greenland study, we used seismic data from the GLATIS and NEAT experiments [25,26]. During these experiments, seismic stations were deployed along the Greenland coast and on the ice sheet for periods ranging from several months to several years.…”
Section: Data and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%