Depth scaling of soil moisture content from surface to profile: multistation testing of observation operators

Abstract

Abstract. The accurate assessment of profile soil moisture for spatial domains is usually difficult due to the associated costs, strong spatial-temporal variability, and nonlinear relationship between surface and profile moisture. Here we attempted to use observation operators built by Cumulative Distribution Frequency (CDF) matching method to directly predict profile soil moisture from surface measurements based on multi-station in situ observations from the Soil and Climate Analysis Network (SCAN). We first analyzed the effects of temporal resolution (hourly, daily and weekly) and data length (half year in nongrowing season, half year in growing season, one year, two years and four years) on the performance of observation operators. The results showed that temporal resolution had a negligible influence on the performance of observation operators. However, data length significantly changed the prediction accuracy of observation operators, and a two-year interval was identified as the optimal data length in building observation operators. A dataset with a two-year duration was therefore used to test the robustness of observation operators in three primary climates (humid continental, humid subtropical and semiarid) of the continental USA, with the popular exponential filter employed as a reference approach. The results indicated that observation operators reliably predicted profile soil moisture for the majority of stations in both calibration and validation periods and performed almost equally well with the exponential filter method. This suggests that observation operators are a feasible statistical tool for depth scaling of soil moisture. The findings here have the potential to be applied in profile soil moisture prediction from surface measurements at a range of environments if the target site has long enough (two years) soil moisture observations even with coarse temporal resolutions. Continuous and accurate measurement of profile soil moisture, however, is difficult because of expensive field Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi

Physiological response of Swiss ecosystems to 2018 drought across plant types and elevation

“…Volumetric SWC was typically measured at several depths at each site-except at CH-AWS where measurements were available from one depth only. For the forest sites, we calculated the depth-weighted average SWC using data from each layer and depth of the layer, following the method of Gao et al [45]:…”

Restoration after bush control in selected rangeland areas of semi-arid savannas in South Africa

“…Soil moisture is an important variable which affects infiltration, runoff, soil temperature and the amount of water available to plants. According to Gao et al (2017), these variables are affected by BT due to the increase of high-density woody plant roots. Since soil moisture has a strong spatial-temporal variability and is affected by the soil type, moisture readings commenced at the end of 2019 rainy season (Gao et al 2017).…”

“…According to Gao et al (2017), these variables are affected by BT due to the increase of high-density woody plant roots. Since soil moisture has a strong spatial-temporal variability and is affected by the soil type, moisture readings commenced at the end of 2019 rainy season (Gao et al 2017). A neutron probe was used to measure soil water content at different depths at the three study sites (Manthe, Shongoane and D'Nyala NR) (Chanasyk & Naeth 1996;Reichardt 2007).…”

Quantifying Long-Term Land Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture over Tibetan Plateau

“…The RZSM can be estimated from SSM by using filtering techniques [28] and analytical models [24,29]. Furthermore, Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) matching could be used to derive RZSM with the depth scaling method [30].…”

“…The scaling parameters of the fifth-order polynomial fitting function were generated from the SSM and the differences between the corresponding values of ranked SSM and RZSM. Gao et al [30] identified the fifth-order polynomial as the optimal choice based on a pre-analysis to define the fitting function for depth scaling. The scaling parameters were used to estimate the predicted difference between SSM and RZSM over the Product Period; then, the predicted RZSM were generated while using blended SSM and the predicted differences.…”