2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aab573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth resolved grazing incidence neutron scattering experiments from semi-infinite interfaces: a statistical analysis of the scattering contributions

Abstract: Grazing incidence neutron scattering experiments offer surface sensitivity by reflecting from an interface at momentum transfers close to total external reflection. Under these conditions the penetration depth is strongly non-linear and may change by many orders of magnitude. This fact imposes severe challenges for depth resolved experiments, since the brilliance of neutron beams is relatively low in comparison to e.g. synchrotron radiation. In this article we use probability density functions to calculate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-space characteristics like beam profile and finite sample surface will be added in future extensions for reflectometry (Section 8.1; compare Adlmann et al, 2018). Real-space characteristics like beam profile and finite sample surface will be added in future extensions for reflectometry (Section 8.1; compare Adlmann et al, 2018).…”
Section: Geometrical Conventions and Detector Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-space characteristics like beam profile and finite sample surface will be added in future extensions for reflectometry (Section 8.1; compare Adlmann et al, 2018). Real-space characteristics like beam profile and finite sample surface will be added in future extensions for reflectometry (Section 8.1; compare Adlmann et al, 2018).…”
Section: Geometrical Conventions and Detector Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The experimental grazing incidence scattering patterns as a function of the different surfactants (C 8 E 3 , C 10 E 4 , C 12 E 5 ) (increasing emulsification efficiency from left to right) and the scattering depth Λ (indicated in the images). The errors of the scattering depths are 10, 26, 150 Å, and 10 µm according to resolution effects [34]. The "divergence" [35] of the scattering depth at the critical angle increases this error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GISANS done in the traditional way a source size of 1.5 mm may be used whereas we use 15 cm, resulting in a potential gain in flux of two orders of magnitude. However, the large incident divergence results in a loss of depth sensitivity 19 . Still the method has all the advantages of neutron scattering experiments benefiting from isotope contrast variation, sensitivity to light elements and the capability to probe buried interfaces as well as the magnetic induction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%