2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40645-022-00488-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth profile of frictional properties in the inner Nankai accretionary prism using cuttings from IODP Site C0002

Abstract: We conduct frictional experiments using cuttings collected at Nankai Trough IODP Site C0002 over 980.5–3262.5 mbsf (meters below seafloor) depth interval to better understand the frictional properties through the accretionary prism. The experiments are conducted at the in situ effective normal stresses (9–37 MPa) under brine-saturated conditions, and the slip velocity is abruptly changed in a stepwise manner to either of 0.3, 3, or 33 µm/s after the steady-state friction is reached. The friction coefficient (μ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For smectite, (a−b) decreases with effective normal stress of up to 70 MPa (Mizutani et al, 2017;Morrow et al, 2017). Sediment samples from the Nankai Trough and illite-rich shale showed a positive trend on (a−b) with respect to a reduction in effective normal stress and an increase in pore pressure (Bedford et al, 2021;Fujioka et al, 2022;den Hartog & Spiers, 2013). All those studies suggest that sediments may be frictionally stable at the in-situ temperature-pressure-mineral conditions in the shallow part of the Nankai accretionary prism.…”
Section: Implications For Seismic Activities In the Shallow Nankai Tr...mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For smectite, (a−b) decreases with effective normal stress of up to 70 MPa (Mizutani et al, 2017;Morrow et al, 2017). Sediment samples from the Nankai Trough and illite-rich shale showed a positive trend on (a−b) with respect to a reduction in effective normal stress and an increase in pore pressure (Bedford et al, 2021;Fujioka et al, 2022;den Hartog & Spiers, 2013). All those studies suggest that sediments may be frictionally stable at the in-situ temperature-pressure-mineral conditions in the shallow part of the Nankai accretionary prism.…”
Section: Implications For Seismic Activities In the Shallow Nankai Tr...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The slope angles of seafloor (α) are 4° and 0.1° for the outer and inner prisms. The μ of sediment within the outer prism (μw) was assumed to be 0.30-0.55 and that within the inner prism was 0.45-0.60 based on friction studies on the drilled samples from each prism (Fujioka et al, 2022;Okuda et al, 2021). From those μ values along the underthrust sediment and the prism sediments, the λb can be evaluated by following equations of the Coulomb wedge model (Dahlen, 1990):…”
Section: Inference On Pore Pressure Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an earlier study found only velocity-strengthening friction for the megasplay (Ikari and Saffer 2011), this was later attributed to testing at higher than in situ stresses (Roesner et al 2020). Other recent studies testing deeper (km-scale) material from the older, inner accretionary prism have shown consistent velocity-strengthening friction (Bedford et al 2021;Fujioka et al 2022), highlighting potentially fundamentally different behavior between the outer and inner prisms that may explain large-scale deformation behavior of the Nankai margin (Kimura et al 2007). Roesner et al (2020) noted that velocity-weakening in the megasplay samples showed larger values of the rate-and-state parameter b, and based on a microphysical explanation for rate-and-state frictional behavior (e.g., Dieterich and Kilgore 1994) suggested that the velocity weakening is somehow related to differences in the real area of contact as a function of effective normal stress.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Observed Behavior and Comparison With Previous...mentioning
confidence: 98%