2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth profile and retention of hydrogen isotopes in graphite tiles used in the W-shaped divertor of JT-60U

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies in JT-60U and JET indicate that carbon erosion and tritium retention in ITER could be smaller than the present estimation [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The purpose of this paper is not to deny the utilization of metallic materials as PFM but to suggest starting ITER with full carbon PFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies in JT-60U and JET indicate that carbon erosion and tritium retention in ITER could be smaller than the present estimation [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The purpose of this paper is not to deny the utilization of metallic materials as PFM but to suggest starting ITER with full carbon PFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In JT-60U, which is operated at 570 K with inertially cooled divertor structure, H/C in the deposited carbon on the outer divertor area was below 0.04 as seen in Table 1 [14]. The deposited carbon was not amorphous like but rather well graphitized and not easy to remove [31].…”
Section: Tritium Incorporation In Carbon Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent retention studies of hydrogen isotopes (hydrogen, deuterium and tritium) in plasma facing graphite 0920-3796/$ -see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.074 tiles used in JT-60U, most of tritium was implanted into plasma facing graphite tiles in the depth of micrometer range but not co-deposited with carbon, while hydrogen and deuterium were retained in very near surface [3][4][5][6][7]. In addition, hydrogen and deuterium distributions were quite different with each other showing much shallower depth profile for hydrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T retention profile in the divertor area was completely separated from H and D profiles because most of T produced by DD reaction was implanted directly into the plasma facing surface without fully loosing its initial energy [28,29]. On the other hand, H and D retention profiles in the divertor region well correlated with the carbon deposition profiles [30]. The retained amount in the deposited layers, however, was very small (below 0.03 in (H + D)/C).…”
Section: Plasma Facing Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%