“…In the last decade, remote‐sensing‐based methods have become increasingly popular to monitor coastal evolution [e.g., Holman and Stanley , ]. These methods often rely on the estimation of an average wave celerity from spatially coherent, instantaneous (∼1 Hz) time series of pixel intensity, which is used as a proxy to retrieve water depth [e.g., Stockdon and Holman , ; Yoo et al ., ; Almar et al ., ; Holman et al ., ]. This so‐called depth‐inversion is an interesting alternative to in situ bathymetric surveys, as it, when repeated with time, provides an estimate of bathymetric change over large areas at relatively low cost; however, its accuracy depends crucially on the functional relationship between time‐averaged wave celerity and water depth, that is to say on the choice of the parametrization for the celerity [see Catalán and Haller , , for a review].…”