2001
DOI: 10.1006/cviu.2000.0899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth from Defocus Estimation in Spatial Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deterministic algorithms can be classified as frequency domain approaches, [1][2][3][4] and spatial domain approaches. [5][6][7][8] The frequency domain approaches are generally computation expensive and yield lower depth-map density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic algorithms can be classified as frequency domain approaches, [1][2][3][4] and spatial domain approaches. [5][6][7][8] The frequency domain approaches are generally computation expensive and yield lower depth-map density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of object surfaces normal to the direction of view, blurring is modeled by a shift-invariant/convolution operation. This case has been addressed through both frequency domain and spatial domain techniques ( [7], [9], [8], [6], [10]). Recently, the problem of 3D shape recovery from space/shift-variant defocused images has been investigated by several researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic algorithms can be classified as frequency domain approaches 3,4 and spatial domain approaches. [5][6][7] The frequency domain approaches are generally computation expensive and yield lower depth-map density. While spatial domain approaches only use a small image region, thus require less computation and generate piecewise depth-map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%