2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-018-0721-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth estimation improvement in 3D integral imaging using an edge removal approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second one called Elemental Imaging from Edge removal (EIEd-rem) approach [24], removes the edges of objects in the EIs when they are in focus. This is a problem that appears when using the variance where the objects close to cameras, once they are in focus, have a tendency to expand their corresponding edges in the scene for images in focus at higher depths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The second one called Elemental Imaging from Edge removal (EIEd-rem) approach [24], removes the edges of objects in the EIs when they are in focus. This is a problem that appears when using the variance where the objects close to cameras, once they are in focus, have a tendency to expand their corresponding edges in the scene for images in focus at higher depths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28] and [37] the use of a photo-consistency measure is proposed by combining a defocus and a correspondence measure in a light-field camera. This measure, made by these two terms, was extended to the case of SAII in [24] and [33]. The defocus measure allows for an optimal contrast to be obtained in a certain patch of the image with the aim to improve stability over occluded regions.…”
Section: B Depth Map and All-in-focus Reconstruction For Median Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations