2019
DOI: 10.1111/let.12289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth as an overarching environmental variable modulating preservation potential and temporal resolution of shelly taphofacies

Abstract: In the marine realm, the interpretation of taphofacies relies heavily on how oceanographic and sedimentary conditions affect the preservation state of fossils. Several taphonomic variables either covary with depth or are directly influenced by depth. Facies‐level factors rather than broad, basin‐scale parameters influence the taphonomic profile of mollusc death assemblages according to actualistic and experimental evidence. To determine the possible relation between depth and the taphonomic conditions of multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the otolith age range at 30 m spans most of the Holocene (6–7961 yr), enabling a clearer signal. The different taphonomic pathways caused by local conditions lead to distinct taphofacies (Brett and Baird 1986; Speyer and Brett 1986; Best and Kidwell 2000a; Tomašových and Zuschin 2009; Petró et al 2018; Ritter et al 2019). Importantly, variation in taphofacies may occur over relatively small spatial and depth scales, as in our case study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the otolith age range at 30 m spans most of the Holocene (6–7961 yr), enabling a clearer signal. The different taphonomic pathways caused by local conditions lead to distinct taphofacies (Brett and Baird 1986; Speyer and Brett 1986; Best and Kidwell 2000a; Tomašových and Zuschin 2009; Petró et al 2018; Ritter et al 2019). Importantly, variation in taphofacies may occur over relatively small spatial and depth scales, as in our case study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erthal (2012) found a correlation between light colors (white, cream) and the presence of mud, and more loosely, between reddish colors and deposits abundant in heavy minerals. Ritter et al (2017) observed the highest color alteration in the shallowest sample of their study, and Ritter et al (2019) noted an increase in the frequency of shells with ocher, yellow, and red colors with depth. As stated above, Tomašových et al (2022) found a relationship between stained bivalves and millennial time averaging, caused by low sedimentary rates and prolonged exposure of shells in a sulfate reduction zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The extent of time averaging in modern marine death assemblages varies according to water depth, encompassing a longer period of time in deeper environments, which tend to have low net sedimentation rates but also vary as a function of mixing (bioturbation) and disintegration of shells in the taphonomically active zone (e.g., Fürsich and Aberhan 1990; Olszewski 1999; Petro et al 2018; Ritter et al 2019; Tomašových et al 2022). In coastal and nearshore environments, where the rates of destruction are higher and the production of shells is temporally limited, time averaging has been estimated to reach a maximum of a few thousand years (Kidwell and Bosence 1991; Flessa et al 1993; Kowalewski et al 1998; Kidwell 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preservation patterns of fossil assemblages are often affected by environmental factors; comparative and quantitative taphonomical analyses of fossil assemblages have, therefore, been useful as a basis for reconstructing paleoenvironments (Speyer and Brett 1988;Smith and Nelson 2003;Best 2008;Darroch et al 2016;Ritter et al 2019). One of the tacit assumptions of taphofacies analyses is that preservation pathways of skeletal remains differing in durability or susceptibility to alteration are similar (Kidwell and Flessa 1996;Behrensmeyer et al 2000;Zuschin et al 2000;Staff et al 2002;Powell et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%