2022
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10111698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth and Heading Control of a Manta Robot Based on S-Plane Control

Abstract: Bionic underwater robots have many advantages such as high mobility, high efficiency, high affinity, etc. They are especially suitable for tasks such as collecting hydrographic information and for detailed surveys of the marine environment. These tasks are based on their high-precision attitude control. Therefore, this paper proposes a control scheme for a bionic underwater robot—a manta robot. To improve the depth retention capability of the manta robot, a S-plane controller based on asymmetric output was des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symbols such as X u̇ in formula (13) are the parameters of the added mass caused by the conversion, they are also called the additional mass. Due to the Coriolis-centrifugal force generated by the additional mass M A , the underwater platform will also consume energy while doing rotational movements.…”
Section: Kinematic Modeling Of Unmanned Underwater Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The symbols such as X u̇ in formula (13) are the parameters of the added mass caused by the conversion, they are also called the additional mass. Due to the Coriolis-centrifugal force generated by the additional mass M A , the underwater platform will also consume energy while doing rotational movements.…”
Section: Kinematic Modeling Of Unmanned Underwater Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is a strongly nonlinear system, it is difficult to establish an accurate mathematical model for it, which brings various problems to the control of AUV [13]. Therefore, some researchers use fuzzy control and other control methods that do not require precise mathematical models to study the attitude control of underwater vehicles, Zhong et al [14] designed the AUV depth controller based on the fuzzy control theory, and realized the AUV's underwater deep-fixing cruise motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T c is the expected thrusting force (or torque) calculated by the control algorithm. T max is the maximum thrusting force (or torque) that the AUV can provide [38].…”
Section: S-plane Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the above methods, the classic S-plane method is more mature and effective in AUV control applications with higher control accuracy. By combining the PD structure with fuzzy logic, the classic S-plane method excels with a simple structure and few parameters requiring regulation, which has made it a commonly-used method for underwater vehicle control [38]. According to the control results from sea trials, the classic S-plane method provides an average overshoot of approximately 0.15 m/s in the velocity control and approximately 6 • in the heading control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these control methods, the classic S-plane method has been proven to be an effective and practical method in extensive engineering practices. Combining the PD control structure with the fuzzy logic, the classic S-plane method has been verified in pool experiments and sea trials and can well meet the accuracy requirements in routine underwater operations [ 44 , 45 ]. Nevertheless, the impact of variable static loads is not taken into consideration by the classic S-plane method, which will degrade the control accuracy, especially in operations with high demands on control accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%