The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2929625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth Analysis of Planar Array for 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different kernel offsets emphasize different features within the algae cells (Fig. 8), and it would be natural to imagine combining these types of measurements with algorithms from electrical impedance tomography [12] to generate a 3-D reconstruction of the sample permittivity.…”
Section: Super-resolution Impedance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different kernel offsets emphasize different features within the algae cells (Fig. 8), and it would be natural to imagine combining these types of measurements with algorithms from electrical impedance tomography [12] to generate a 3-D reconstruction of the sample permittivity.…”
Section: Super-resolution Impedance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of reconstructing conductivity distribution from boundary measurement is defined as the inverse problem of EIT. 32 For small change of conductivity distribution Δσ, the boundary voltage variation ΔU can be simplified and formulated as…”
Section: Modeling Of Eitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be remarked that boundary voltage can be measured while conductivity distribution is generally unknown in real cases. The process of reconstructing conductivity distribution from boundary measurement is defined as the inverse problem of EIT 32 . For small change of conductivity distribution Δ σ , the boundary voltage variation Δ U can be simplified and formulated as normalΔU=dUnormalΔσ+O()()normalΔσ2dUnormalΔσ. Based on finite element method, Equation () is discretized and reformulated as r=italicSg, where rm×1 is the discretized difference voltage, Sm×n stands for sensitivity matrix, which can be obtained by solving forward problem according to Geselowitz's sensitivity theorem, 33 gn×1 is the discretized difference conductivity, m denotes the number of boundary measurements and n is the pixels number inside Ω.…”
Section: Modeling Of Eitmentioning
confidence: 99%