Depressive Symptomatik bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland

Bretschneider, Julia; Kuhnert, Ronny; Hapke, Ulfert

doi:10.17886/rki-gbe-2017-058

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is estimated that 5% of the global population are living with depression, and 8.5% are living with diabetes (World Health Organization, 2021a. In Germany, the prevalence estimates are even higher, with 10.1% for depression (Bretschneider et al, 2017) and up to 9.9% with diabetes (Heidemann & Schmidt-Nave, 2017). Thus, diabetes and depression are among the most prevalent health issues in Germany and worldwide, which not only cause great costs, but can also considerably impair people's quality of life (Goldney et al, 2004).…”

Section: Diabetes and Depression As Relevant Health Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Is (Held) Responsible for Diabetes and Depression?

Temmann

2023

EJHC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsibility frames and attributions of responsibility are closely linked to health-related stigma and social support intentions, which present relevant influencing factors for health outcomes. According to social-ecological models, health responsibility can potentially be attributed to at least three levels: 1) the individual, 2) the social network, and 3) society. So far, little is known about responsibility attributions to the social network. This qualitative interview study explores how N = 22 persons with and without lived experience with diabetes and depression react to a media frame attributing responsibility to the social network level, aiming to understand how framing and responsibility attributions are linked to health-related stigma and endorsement of social support. Results demonstrate that specifically type 2 diabetes is linked to individually controllable attributions and behavioural stigma, and individuals living with type 2 diabetes are expected to manage their condition without considerable social support. In contrast, depression is seen as less controllable, less manageable, and dependent on social and professional support. For both diabetes and depression, frames attributing responsibility to the social network may stimulate social support but also carry certain risks. These results offer implications for health news reporting, and perspectives for further research on health-related responsibility framing.

show abstract

Section: Diabetes and Depression As Relevant Health Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Is (Held) Responsible for Diabetes and Depression?

Temmann

2023

EJHC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Depressive disorders are one of the leading contributors to the burden of disease worldwide and among the most prevalent mental illnesses in Germany (1,2). People with depression often struggle with access to mental health care and waiting times for specialist or psychotherapeutic treatment (3)(4)(5)(6).…”

Section: Introduction 1depressive Disorders and The Burden Of Diseasementioning

confidence: 99%

A qualitative interview study of patients' attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on prescription

Posselt,

Baumann,

Dierks

2024

Front. Digit. Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDepressive disorders are an emerging public health topic. Due to their increasing prevalence, patients with depressive disorders suffer from the lack of therapeutic treatment. Digital health interventions may offer an opportunity to bridge waiting times, supplement, or even substitute in-person treatment. Among others, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) explains that actual technology use is affected by users' behavioural intention. However, patients' perspectives on digital interventions are rarely discussed within the specific context of primary care provided by general practitioners (GP) and need further exploration.MethodA qualitative study design with semi-structured interviews was used to explore DTx-acceptance of patients with mild or moderate depression (n = 17). The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and thematically analysed by qualitative content analysis.ResultsPatients' performance expectancies reveal that DTx are not perceived as a substitute for face-to-face treatment. Effort expectancies include potential advantages and efforts concerning technical, motivational, and skill-based aspects. Moreover, we identified health status and experience with depressive disorders as other determinants and potential barriers to patients' DTx acceptance: Difficult stages of depression or long-time experience are perceived hurdles for DTx use. GPs' recommendations were just partly relevant for patients and varied according to patients' consultancy preferences. But still, GPs have a crucial role for access due to prescription. GPs' influence on patients' DTx acceptance varies between three situations: (1) pre-use for consultation, (2) pre-use for access and (3) during DTx-use. Further, GPs' guidance could be especially relevant for patients during DTx-use in routine care.DiscussionThe UTAUT-based exploration suggests that acceptance determinants should be considered independently and embedded in personal and situational aspects. DTx require a healthcare professional to prescribe or diagnose the disease, unlike other digital offerings. We identified prescription- and depression-related determinants, exceeding existing theoretical constructs. GPs' guidance can compensate for some barriers to DTx use e.g., by increasing commitment and motivational support to strengthen patients' acceptance.ConclusionWe argue for a multidimensional integration of acceptance determinants for further development of health technology acceptance research. Future research should specify how DTx can be integrated into routine care to strengthen user acceptance.

show abstract

Disstress – Prävalenz, Bedeutung und Implikationen für die Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung

Mohokum¹,

Tiemann²

2021

Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Depressive Symptomatik bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Who Is (Held) Responsible for Diabetes and Depression?

Who Is (Held) Responsible for Diabetes and Depression?

A qualitative interview study of patients' attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on prescription

Disstress – Prävalenz, Bedeutung und Implikationen für die Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About