2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression recognition based on the reconstruction of phase space of EEG signals and geometrical features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is difficult to partition the available EEG dataset of small sample size into a training dataset used for training classifiers and an independent test dataset of sufficient size. Due to this limitation, previous studies have only estimated the efficacy of their method in MDD detection by performing a k-fold CV on the entire EEG dataset, where k = 10 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,19,22,25] or k = number of EEG samples [9,17,23] (i.e., leave-one-out (LOO)). Directly performing a 10-fold CV on the group of participants (i.e., partitioning the entire group into 10 folds, with no EEGs of the same participants appearing in different folds at the same time) is nearly impossible due to participant size limitations.…”
Section: Cross Validation Used In Previous Work: More Detailed Review and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is difficult to partition the available EEG dataset of small sample size into a training dataset used for training classifiers and an independent test dataset of sufficient size. Due to this limitation, previous studies have only estimated the efficacy of their method in MDD detection by performing a k-fold CV on the entire EEG dataset, where k = 10 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,19,22,25] or k = number of EEG samples [9,17,23] (i.e., leave-one-out (LOO)). Directly performing a 10-fold CV on the group of participants (i.e., partitioning the entire group into 10 folds, with no EEGs of the same participants appearing in different folds at the same time) is nearly impossible due to participant size limitations.…”
Section: Cross Validation Used In Previous Work: More Detailed Review and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have tried to apply machine learning (ML) methods to classify resting-state (e.g., [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]) versus task-related (e.g., [ 21 , 24 , 25 ]) electroencephalography (EEG) signals between MDD and healthy control (HC) groups. A few studies have also proposed multi-model systems that fuse EEG signals and other physiological data (e.g., [ 26 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Xu et al [18] created an intelligent human-computer interaction (HCI) system for depression recognition, in which an audio-depression regression model determines the prevalence rate of depression based on CNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) network, and put forward a differential regression features extraction algorithm for multiscale audios to describe the features of nonpersonalized audios. Akbari et al [19] proposed a novel depression detection approach based on reconstructed phase space (RPS) and geometric features of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, plotted the RPS maps of the EEG signals of 22 normal people and 22 depression patients in two-dimensional (2D) space, and extracted 34 geometric features according to the map shapes. It was learned that, compared with the RPS of depression patients' EEG signals, the RPS of normal people's EEG signals has a high regularity, limited changes, and predictable shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%