2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau: Treatment by lateral femoral epicondyle osteotomy approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fang et al compared the intraarticular osteotomy approach with the anteromedial “window” osteotomy approach for PL-depression tibial plateau fractures, and demonstrated that the intraarticular osteotomy could obtain satisfactory clinical results for such patients 20 . Durigan et al introduced a lateral femoral epicondyle osteotomy approach for the treatment of PL-depression tibial plateau fractures and found that this approach allowed direct reduction and stable fixation of the PL fragment without functional impairment 21 . Yet, although the intraarticular and epicondyle osteotomy approaches could provide direct vision of the PL fragment, the surgical trauma is large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al compared the intraarticular osteotomy approach with the anteromedial “window” osteotomy approach for PL-depression tibial plateau fractures, and demonstrated that the intraarticular osteotomy could obtain satisfactory clinical results for such patients 20 . Durigan et al introduced a lateral femoral epicondyle osteotomy approach for the treatment of PL-depression tibial plateau fractures and found that this approach allowed direct reduction and stable fixation of the PL fragment without functional impairment 21 . Yet, although the intraarticular and epicondyle osteotomy approaches could provide direct vision of the PL fragment, the surgical trauma is large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, surgical access has primarily been explored through lateral or posterior approaches. Although the posterior approach and implant fixation offers biomechanical benefits, it comes with a heightened risk of iatrogenic injury and limited exposure of the fracture site ( Kim et al, 2018 ; Cai et al, 2021 ; Durigan et al, 2023 ). On the other hand, the lateral approach stands as one of the most prevalent surgical options embraced by a majority of surgeons, given its lower risk of vascular and nerve injuries ( Cho et al, 2017 ; Sun et al, 2018 ; Hu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 33 , 37 In general, the primary aim in surgical treatment of PTPF is to obtain a congruent knee joint with adequate stability allowing for early range of motion exercise. Despite a variety of approaches and fixation methods for optimizing the prognosis of PTPF, 7 , 30 there are few studies on accompanying knee ligament and meniscal injuries. In clinical work, the management of tibial plateau fractures and soft tissue injuries also tends to be clearly divided, with the 2 not forming a holistic solution like the Lauge-Hansen classification system for the time being.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%