2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depositional environments and ichnology of the deep-marine succession of the Amiran Formation (upper Maastrichtian–Paleocene), Lurestan Province, Zagros Fold–Thrust Belt, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the location within the system, bed type association 3.3 is interpreted to be lateral to the main sediment flux pathways, and can be interpreted as intralobe splay or lobe fringe (Brunt et al, 2013;Terlaky et al, 2016). The increased intensity of bioturbation away from the other bed type associations also supports this interpretation (Heard & Pickering, 2008;Bayet-Goll et al, 2014.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…With respect to the location within the system, bed type association 3.3 is interpreted to be lateral to the main sediment flux pathways, and can be interpreted as intralobe splay or lobe fringe (Brunt et al, 2013;Terlaky et al, 2016). The increased intensity of bioturbation away from the other bed type associations also supports this interpretation (Heard & Pickering, 2008;Bayet-Goll et al, 2014.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Regularly thin‐bedded, fine‐ to very fine‐grained turbidites with good lateral continuity and high contents of relatively thick mudstone facies support an interpretation of BTA 3c as lobe distal fringe with the deposition of dilute low concentration turbidity currents or basin plain with slow hemipelagic deposition. The interpretation of the lateral lobe fringe depositional environment is further supported by the intensity of bioturbation in BTA 3c as observed at Locality 4 (see Bayet‐Goll, Monaco, Jalili, & Mahmudie‐Gharaie, 2016; Bayet‐Goll, Neto de Carvalho, Moussavi‐Harami, Mahboubi, & Nasiri, 2014; Heard & Pickering, 2008).…”
Section: Bed Type Associations and Their Palaeoenvironmental Significancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The decrease in sedimentation rate and grain size of turbidity currents leading to emplacement of discrete turbidite sandstone separate by mudstone intervals, rather than amalgamated sandstone beds. In addition to wrinkle structures, the high abundance of predepositional elements indicates long‐term stability on the sea‐floor with respect to ecologic conditions between successive phases of turbidite sedimentation (Bayet‐Goll et al, 2014, 2016; Callow et al, 2014; Heard & Pickering, 2008; Uchman, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of wrinkle structures in shale beds does not necessarily mean the absence of mat‐forming organisms or the absence of mats; rather, it points to the absence of appropriate conditions for the preservation of these structures (Mata & Bottjer, 2009). Compared to B2 and B3 facies associations, decrease in diversity and abundance of trace fossils in hemipelagic mudstone and siltstone, especially the absence of graphoglyptids, is the result of thick turbiditic mudstone leading to substrate instability and the absence of a casting medium (see Uchman, 1995; Heard & Pickering, 2008; Cummings & Hodgson, 2011; Bayet‐Goll, Neto De Carvalho, et al, 2014; Callow et al, 2014 for more discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%