2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition rates and 14C apparent ages of Holocene sediments in the Bothnian Bay of the Gulf of Bothnia using paleomagnetic dating as a reference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 6-m-deep Kullenberg core, age determinations were done by the identification of key paleomagnetic signatures as described in Suteerasak et al (2017). The direction of the natural remanent magnetization, as well as any reconstructed secular variations of the Earth's m a g n e t i c f i e l d , w e r e c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e FENNOSTACK master curve presented by Snowball and Sandgren (2002).…”
Section: Bothnian Bay Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 6-m-deep Kullenberg core, age determinations were done by the identification of key paleomagnetic signatures as described in Suteerasak et al (2017). The direction of the natural remanent magnetization, as well as any reconstructed secular variations of the Earth's m a g n e t i c f i e l d , w e r e c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e FENNOSTACK master curve presented by Snowball and Sandgren (2002).…”
Section: Bothnian Bay Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,000 years BP. The dating is based on peaks of the master curve with corresponding maxima and minima of the relative declination and inclination identified by visual inspection (Suteerasak et al 2017). The topmost part (16 cm) of the Gemini core was additionally dated using 137 Cs related to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in 1986.…”
Section: Bothnian Bay Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%