2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(99)00062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition of Nanosized Particles in Cylindrical Tubes Under Laminar and Turbulent Flow Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the lower Dean number cases as shown in Fig. 12 for De = 150 and 300, the results are in agreement with the theory of Friendlander [22] and the experimental results given by Malet et al [19]. The penetration efficiencies are higher in the case of higher Dean number than that of lower one.…”
Section: Relationship Between Penetration Efficiency and Schmidt Numbersupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the lower Dean number cases as shown in Fig. 12 for De = 150 and 300, the results are in agreement with the theory of Friendlander [22] and the experimental results given by Malet et al [19]. The penetration efficiencies are higher in the case of higher Dean number than that of lower one.…”
Section: Relationship Between Penetration Efficiency and Schmidt Numbersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For nanoparticles, the Stokes number is usually less than 10 À5 , diffusion instead of inertial is the main factor causing particles deposition [17][18]. Therefore, the effects of the flow property and particle property on the penetration efficiency can be integrated into the Schmidt number, Sc ¼ m=D (where m is the kinematic viscosity of fluid, D is the particle diffusion coefficient) [19][20]. Meanwhile, in the transport process, the changes in particle distribution over the cross-section will happen because of particle diffusion, coagulation and breakage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of aerosol from the top of a 10 m sampling tower poses significant difficulties, owing to effects such as Brownian coagulation and diffusion losses to the wall (Alonso et al, 1999;Malet et al, 2000). To minimise these effects, a specifically designed sampling stack drew aerosol down a 30 cm diameter plastic tube to laboratory level, where they were iso-kinetically sub-sampled into an 8 cm diameter stainless steel tube leading to the laboratory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attribute this to neglecting ion losses in the calculation. Then, standard expressions of the ion depletion rate by diffusion to the walls in laminar (Maisels et al 2003) and turbulent (Malet et al 2000) flows in pipes were used for ω i in Equation (1a) and a new calculation was performed. Diffusional losses had a minor impact on model predictions, with respect to the calculation with no ion losses.…”
Section: Polydisperse Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%