1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(81)90044-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition of 0.1 μm chain aggregate aerosols in beagle dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results seem to be di erent from the published experimental tests on human and animal [26][27][28], in which smaller overall deposition fraction (lower than 30%) has been measured for both total lung and alveolar region. The overall deposition fraction is dened as the amount of particles captured in the alveolar region compared to the amount of particles entering through the mouth or nose.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…These results seem to be di erent from the published experimental tests on human and animal [26][27][28], in which smaller overall deposition fraction (lower than 30%) has been measured for both total lung and alveolar region. The overall deposition fraction is dened as the amount of particles captured in the alveolar region compared to the amount of particles entering through the mouth or nose.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The majority of particles deposited to the terminal bronchioles measure less than 10 ¿tm in diameter. Larger particles are effectively removed by the conducting airway (Melandri et al, 1975;Thorne et al, 1985;Wolff et al, 1981).…”
Section: Influence Of Sample Size and Preparation On Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…to fibrogenesis are still poorly understood. The biological characteristics of the dusts are largely unknown, although it is suggested that the dust size, shape, surface charge, roughness, surface chemical composition, trace metal content, and crystallinity; dose of silica in the ambient air of the workplace; duration of exposure; genetic variation in exposed subjects; personal respiratory patterns; and presence of any coexisting disease (such as tuberculosis or rheumatoid arthritis) all influence the expression of silicosis (Koskinen et al, 1983;Noweir et al, 1980;Raask and Schilling, 1980;Reiser and Last, 1979;Thorne et al, 1985;Wolff et al, 1981). The actual biochemical mechanisms through which these factors operate are still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The induced diseases observed in laboratory animals may not always have direct counterparts in man, and vice versa. This is illustrated by our inability to yet (98). These are considered to be good estimates for man until such time as similar data can be obtained in people.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 97%