2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition and remobilization of graphene oxide within saturated sand packs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7A). A similar trend was observed in previous reports for another two-dimensional nanomaterial (graphene oxide) (Feriancikova and Xu, 2012), and it was reported that the existence of a secondary minimum contributed to the removal of graphene oxide particles during transport through reversible chemical (electrostatic) interactions. For the MoS 2 -PL a secondary minimum was not observed when MoS 2-MoS 2 interactions were considered.…”
Section: Dlvo Theorysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7A). A similar trend was observed in previous reports for another two-dimensional nanomaterial (graphene oxide) (Feriancikova and Xu, 2012), and it was reported that the existence of a secondary minimum contributed to the removal of graphene oxide particles during transport through reversible chemical (electrostatic) interactions. For the MoS 2 -PL a secondary minimum was not observed when MoS 2-MoS 2 interactions were considered.…”
Section: Dlvo Theorysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The interactions between the PEO functional groups present on the MoS 2 -PL surface and the Si function groups on the quartz collector are likely forming strong intermolecular bonds and resulting in irreversible attachment. This irreversible attachment was not observed in other two-dimensional planar particles (i.e., graphene oxide) that exhibited *100% remobilization once DI water was injected during the release portion of a column experiment (Feriancikova and Xu, 2012;Lanphere et al, 2013). The release experiments highlight the different behaviors for MoS 2 during transport in sand columns; with MoS 2 -PL being the least sensitive to change in IS and less mobile compared with MoS 2 -Li when the remobilization (M R ) parameter was considered at similar conditions.…”
Section: Remobilization Of Mosmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, promoted As(V) transport increased with increasing soil colloid concentration at pH 9.8, although a high ionic strength was associated with a high concentration of soil colloid. According to the DLVO theory (Feriancikova and Xu, 2012;Wu et al, 2013), when the colloids approached the surface of porous media, the electric double layer repulsion would prevent colloids from landing on the surface of porous media at a certain pH (pH 9.8 in this study), and thus colloidal transport was active in porous media. Based on this investigation, the hypothesis was developed and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mechanism and Hypothesis Of Soil Colloid-promoted As(v) Tranmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…DLVO theory was used to calculate the interaction forces between the soil colloid and the sand, assuming plate-plate interactions (Feriancikova and Xu, 2012;Wu et al, 2013), in order to explain the mechanisms of soil colloid transport and retention in porous media. The DLVO energy interactions, the sum of van der Waals attraction and electric double layer repulsion between the soil colloid and the sand surface, were calculated.…”
Section: Transport Of Soil Colloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%