Deployment and test of IPv6 services in the VTHD network

Adam, Y.; Fillinger, B.; Astic, Isabelle; Lahmadi, Abdelkader; Brigant, P.

doi:10.1109/mcom.2004.1262168

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This enables networks to support both IPv4 and IPv6 services and applications at the same time during the transition period. At the present time, the dual-stack approach achieves a relatively good performance [2]. Although the dual-stack approach carries twice the complexity of a single stack, it appears to be the natural choice in the long run.…”

Section: The Transition Techniques From Ipv4 To Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Adam et al [2] analyzed the issues of the implementation of the IPv6 service, IPv6 performance (in the context of a high-speed network), the advantages of current transition technologies, and the problems encountered. They also provided a performance comparison between three different transition mechanisms: IPv6 in IPv4 tunneling, 6PE tunneling (IPv6 over an IPv4 MPLS network), and dual stack in a local very high-speed broadband network.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(1) How much different do IPv6 tunnels paths behave from their IPv4 counterparts over time? (2) How much different do native IPv6 paths behave from their IPv4 counterparts over time? (3) Can that difference explain the reason why IPv6 is outperformed?…”

Section: Evolution Of Delay Performance Of All Ttm Paths Over 2 Yearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Qualifying the IPv6 performance [1] requires measurements collected over time, combined with information about the delay, the path, and the tunnel discovery. Earlier studies have mainly focused on IPv6 transition technologies [2] or on identifying IPv6 network problems in a dual-stack world by using measurements from only a few days [3,4]. Compared with IPv4, IPv6 is still in its infancy and it is rarely used by real-life applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

IPv6 delay and loss performance evolution

Zhou

Jacobsson

Uijterwaal³

et al. 2007

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYAlthough packet delay and loss are two important parameters of the Internet performance, to the best of our knowledge, the evolution of large-scale IPv6 delay and loss performance has previously not been studied. In this paper, we analyze more than 600 end-to-end IPv6 paths between about 26 testboxes of RIPE Network Coordination Centre over two years, and compare the delay and loss performance over time with their IPv4 counterparts. We present and discuss the measurement methodologies and show that IPv6 paths have a higher delay and loss than their IPv4 counterparts. The main reason for the worse performance stems from IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels rather than from native IPv6 paths and such tunnels are still widely used today.

show abstract

Section: The Transition Techniques From Ipv4 To Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evolution Of Delay Performance Of All Ttm Paths Over 2 Yearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

IPv6 delay and loss performance evolution

Zhou

Jacobsson

Uijterwaal³

et al. 2007

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the introduction of IPv6 in the existing networks has not been done yet at a large scale. The best strategy of introducing IPv6 in the running networks is still under discussion as well as the best way of taking advantage of its new features [30] [31].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%