2014
DOI: 10.1021/jf501492v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depletion of Penicillin G Residues in Heavy Sows after Intramuscular Injection. Part I: Tissue Residue Depletion

Abstract: Heavy sows (n = 126) were treated with penicillin G procaine at a 5× label dose (33 000 IU/kg) for 3 consecutive days by intramuscular (IM) injection using three patterns of drug administration. Treatments differed by injection pattern and injection volume. Sets of sows were slaughtered 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 32, and 39 days after the last treatment; skeletal muscle, kidney, serum, and urine were collected for penicillin G analysis by LC-MS/MS. Penicillin G at withdrawal day 5 averaged 23.5 ± 10.5 and 3762 ± 1932 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The model slightly over predicted the early phase for plasma, liver, and muscle (within twofold difference in Figure and Supporting information Figure ), and greatly over predicted the concentrations of penicillin G in kidneys for both doses (Figure b,e). The exact reason for this over prediction is unknown, but it may be because the measured concentrations in kidney in the present study were fairly low compared to previous two studies (Apley et al, ; Lupton et al, ). By adjusting the kidney partition coefficient value from 10 to 1, the simulation (blacked dashed lines in Figure b,e) better correlated with the measured data for both doses.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The model slightly over predicted the early phase for plasma, liver, and muscle (within twofold difference in Figure and Supporting information Figure ), and greatly over predicted the concentrations of penicillin G in kidneys for both doses (Figure b,e). The exact reason for this over prediction is unknown, but it may be because the measured concentrations in kidney in the present study were fairly low compared to previous two studies (Apley et al, ; Lupton et al, ). By adjusting the kidney partition coefficient value from 10 to 1, the simulation (blacked dashed lines in Figure b,e) better correlated with the measured data for both doses.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The predicted WDI with label dose after single IM injection is conservative compared to label withdrawal period of 6 days in swine (all use classes). The predicted WDI after 3 repeated IM injections at 5x label dose is also conservative compared to reported WDI of 28 days in heavy sows from Apley et al (Apley et al, ) and is shorter than 51 days for heavy sows estimated in the study of Lupton et al (Lupton et al, ). Note that if the estimated WDI was a fraction of a day, it was rounded up to the next whole day.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations