1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.54.6500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depletion interactions in colloid-polymer mixtures

Abstract: We present a neutron-scattering study of depletion interactions in a mixture of a hard-sphere-like colloid and a nonadsorbing polymer. By matching the scattering length density of the solvent with that of the polymer, we measured the partial structure factor S c (Q) for the colloidal particles. It is found that the measured S c (Q) for different colloid and polymer concentrations can be well described by an effective interaction potential U(r) for the polymer-induced depletion attraction between the colloidal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
153
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pair potential can, once again, be identified with the depletion potential between two large spheres in a sea of small particles. In the present case the depletion potential is more complicated than that for ideal small particles, where it is simply the Asakura-Oosawa potential (8), and there are no exact results available for arbitrary q and η r 2 . We use an approximation given by Götzelmann et al, which provides an excellent fit to simulation results for the depletion potential for two hard spheres in a sea of small hard spheres for q = 0.1 and reservoir packing fractions η r 2 as large as 0.34 [25].…”
Section: Phase Diagrams Obtained From the Depletion Potentialmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pair potential can, once again, be identified with the depletion potential between two large spheres in a sea of small particles. In the present case the depletion potential is more complicated than that for ideal small particles, where it is simply the Asakura-Oosawa potential (8), and there are no exact results available for arbitrary q and η r 2 . We use an approximation given by Götzelmann et al, which provides an excellent fit to simulation results for the depletion potential for two hard spheres in a sea of small hard spheres for q = 0.1 and reservoir packing fractions η r 2 as large as 0.34 [25].…”
Section: Phase Diagrams Obtained From the Depletion Potentialmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Static colloid-colloid structure factors S(k) were measured recently in the colloidal liquid phase at triple coexistence, for different size ratios, using a novel application of two-colour dynamic light scattering [7]. There are also recent neutron scattering determinations of S(k) for a series of size ratios and polymer concentrations [8]. The new experimental results [7] motivated Louis et al [9] to calculate the three partial structure factors for the Asakura-Oosawa model using the Percus-Yevick approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Pt/C particles approach each other, the sulphonic acid side chain apposes attraction causing steric repulsion due to the unfavourable decrease in conformational entropy. Colloidal surfaces are thus maintained at distances large enough to damp any attractions due to the depletion effect or London-van der Waals forces and the colloidal suspension is stabilised [27]. Sterically stabilised systems tend to remain stable even at high salt concentrations [28] and conditions were the zeta potentials of the surfaces are reduced to near zero.…”
Section: Catalyst Ink Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining SAXS measurements and numerical simulations, we can also analyze forces present in macromolecule solutions, that is to say the different repulsive and attractive components, and study them as a function of common physico-chemical parameters. This type of approach has already been used in the case of colloid-polymer mixtures (Lutterbach et al, 1999a;Lutterbach et al, 1999b;Ye et al, 1996) or biopolymers (Malfois et al, 1996;Vérétout et al, 1989).…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%