2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depleting Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the transcription termination factor Rho causes pervasive transcription and rapid death

Abstract: Rifampicin, which inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase, provides one of the most effective treatments for tuberculosis. Inhibition of the transcription termination factor Rho is used to treat some bacterial infections, but its importance varies across bacteria. Here we show that Rho of Mycobacterium tuberculosis functions to both define the 3′ ends of mRNAs and silence substantial fragments of the genome. Brief inactivation of Rho affects over 500 transcripts enriched for genes of foreign DNA elements and bacteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
79
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(74 reference statements)
5
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study of Rho function in Mtb (41) found that depletion of Rho did not impact transcriptional boundaries at predicted RITs (43, 44), demonstrating a clear separation in the populations of transcripts terminated by RITs and Rho-dependent mechanisms. While we found that TSEs promote expression of Mcr11, their underlying mechanism remains unclear and our data do not precisely fit either the current RIT or Rho-dependent termination models (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study of Rho function in Mtb (41) found that depletion of Rho did not impact transcriptional boundaries at predicted RITs (43, 44), demonstrating a clear separation in the populations of transcripts terminated by RITs and Rho-dependent mechanisms. While we found that TSEs promote expression of Mcr11, their underlying mechanism remains unclear and our data do not precisely fit either the current RIT or Rho-dependent termination models (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several mycobacterial sRNAs have multiple reported 3’ ends, suggestive of Rho-dependent termination and/or post-transcriptional processing (23, 30, 31). However, relatively little is known about transcriptional termination in Mtb, particularly at sRNAs (41-45).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of Rho function in Mtb (Botella, Vaubourgeix, Livny, & Schnappinger, ) found that depletion of Rho did not impact transcriptional boundaries at predicted RITs (Gardner et al, ; Mitra et al, ), demonstrating a clear separation in the populations of transcripts terminated by RITs and Rho‐dependent mechanisms. While we found that TSEs promote expression of Mcr11, their underlying mechanism remains unclear and our data do not precisely fit either the current RIT or Rho‐dependent termination models (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Mcr11 TSEs 2–4, which contributed strongly to the termination of Mcr11, all possess C‐rich loops in their predicted secondary structures that could be rut sites (Figure ). Rho‐significant regions (RSRs) reported in the Botella et al study (Botella et al, ) include an RSR that begins 6 nt downstream of the mapped 3′ end of Mcr11, that is characterized as a region of general antisense transcription. The presence of this RSR is consistent with the possibility that mcr11 expression is Rho‐terminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the targets of the mycobacterial drugs cycloserine (alanine racemase, D-alanine – D-alanine ligase), rifamycins (RNA polymerase beta subunit), macrolides (50S ribosome), aminoglycosides (30S ribosome), fluoroquinolones (type IV topoisomerases and gyrases), bedaquiline (ATP synthase), and ethambutol (arabinosyltransferase). Additional compounds that have been reported to have some activity against mycobacteria include tryptophan synthase inhibitors 11 , ClpP inhibitors 12 , and Rho inhibitors (albeit only shown to be effective through genetic manipulation) 13 . A brief literature search also reveals many compounds that inhibit non-mycobacterial orthologs of these genes but appear to lack published results for killing activity in mycobacteria including inhibitors of GroEL 14 , RibBA 15 , SecA 16 , and LigA 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%