2023
DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad035
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users’ activity on fringe social media

Abstract: Online platforms have banned (“deplatformed”) influencers, communities, and even entire websites to reduce content deemed harmful. Deplatformed users often migrate to alternative platforms, which raises concerns about the effectiveness of deplatforming. Here, we study the deplatforming of Parler, a fringe social media platform, between 2020 January 11 and 2021 February 25, in the aftermath of the US Capitol riot. Using two large panels that capture longitudinal user-level activity across mainstream and fringe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One popular tool to counter extremists' use of online platforms to propagandize and recruit followers has been to ban or deplatform particularly prominent and hateful accounts (Thomas and Wahedi 2023). These bans often have the unintended consequences of pushing extremists (and their followers) to various fringe platforms where they can be less easily monitored by both policy-makers and researchers and, on which, users are exposed to more and more extreme content (Horta Ribeiro et al 2023;Klinenberg 2023;Mitts 2021). For example, in response to deplatforming efforts by Twitter, many on the "alt-right," including various white nationalist leaders, created new accounts on sites like Gab (Jasser et al 2023;Mitts 2021) or Telegram (Urman and Katz 2022).…”
Section: Extremist Leaders' Use Of Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular tool to counter extremists' use of online platforms to propagandize and recruit followers has been to ban or deplatform particularly prominent and hateful accounts (Thomas and Wahedi 2023). These bans often have the unintended consequences of pushing extremists (and their followers) to various fringe platforms where they can be less easily monitored by both policy-makers and researchers and, on which, users are exposed to more and more extreme content (Horta Ribeiro et al 2023;Klinenberg 2023;Mitts 2021). For example, in response to deplatforming efforts by Twitter, many on the "alt-right," including various white nationalist leaders, created new accounts on sites like Gab (Jasser et al 2023;Mitts 2021) or Telegram (Urman and Katz 2022).…”
Section: Extremist Leaders' Use Of Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%