1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-2977(73)80044-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dépistage automatique de la syphilis sur Groupamatic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of potentially dangerous donors in case of non-isogroup transfusion is 2.86% of the total number of screened donors. This detection is performed simultaneously with other immunohaematological and serological tests: ABO and Rh grouping, screening of irregular allo-antibodies, screening of syphilis.All immunohaematological tests concerning voluntary donors of the CNTS are performed on two Groupamatic® [4][5][6][7], We thus found it necessary to extend the automation up to the screening of so-called 'dangerous' donors whose blood units may not be transfused in an iso group fashion. This screening used to be made manually on all group O donors by a haemolytic test of Ax and B cells in presence of human complement, following the technique described by Mollison [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of potentially dangerous donors in case of non-isogroup transfusion is 2.86% of the total number of screened donors. This detection is performed simultaneously with other immunohaematological and serological tests: ABO and Rh grouping, screening of irregular allo-antibodies, screening of syphilis.All immunohaematological tests concerning voluntary donors of the CNTS are performed on two Groupamatic® [4][5][6][7], We thus found it necessary to extend the automation up to the screening of so-called 'dangerous' donors whose blood units may not be transfused in an iso group fashion. This screening used to be made manually on all group O donors by a haemolytic test of Ax and B cells in presence of human complement, following the technique described by Mollison [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%