1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depersonalization: neurobiological perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
198
3
16

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
17
198
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Positive correlations between the intensity of dissociation and activation of the left medial frontal gyrus as found in our study are consistent with the corticolimbic model of depersonalization. 15 This model postulates that the medial frontal regions inhibit limbic structures during states of depersonalization. Also, in agreement with this model, we found a negative correlation between dissociation and activation in the right parahippocampal gyrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 Positive correlations between the intensity of dissociation and activation of the left medial frontal gyrus as found in our study are consistent with the corticolimbic model of depersonalization. 15 This model postulates that the medial frontal regions inhibit limbic structures during states of depersonalization. Also, in agreement with this model, we found a negative correlation between dissociation and activation in the right parahippocampal gyrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sierra and Berrios 15 proposed a corticolimbic model of depersonalization which suggests that hypoemotionality and decreased arousal results from activation of the left medial prefrontal cortex with reciprocal amygdala inhibition, whereas dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation with reciprocal anterior cingulate inhibition leads to hypervigilance and emptiness of mental contents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depersonalization has also been the focus of a number of neurobiological studies (Baker et al 2003;Medford et al 2005;Simeon et al 2000Simeon et al , 2004. These studies have lent support to a 'cortico-limbic' model (Sierra and Berrios 1998) in which inhibitory activity in the prefrontal cortex disrupts the "emotional tagging" of perceptual and cognitive material by the amygdala and related structures. The disruption results in suppressed autonomic arousal and a sense of disconnection from reality.…”
Section: The Neurobiology Of Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In one explicitly evolutionary version of this adaptive explanation, it is argued that depersonalization (a key dissociative symptom characterized by the feeling of being detached from one's physical and/or psychological being) is actually hardwired as an adaptive mechanism (Sierra and Berrios 1998). The argument is that in the face of certain types of acute stress-specifically, situations in which the individual lacks control over the environment and cannot localize the source of threat (e.g., natural disasters)-the inhibition of "non-functional emotional responses" would serve an adaptive purpose.…”
Section: The Psychiatric-adaptive Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of autonomic blunting in the face of considerable self-reported stress might be interpreted as an attempt to psychophysiologically remain within the ‘Window of Tolerance’ (Corrigan et al, 2011), eventually due to over-regulation of affect (van Dijke, 2012; van Dijke et al, 2010). It would be interesting to readminister our experiment in a fMRI scanner to explore whether autonomic blunting in our stress paradigm is accompanied by corticolimbic inhibition, a well-known pathomechanism in Depersonalization-Derealization Disorder (Sierra & Berrios, 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%